Laserfiche WebLink
Special Council Meeting <br />11-9-98 <br />Page 6 <br />Alternate 5 -Fencing - to use chain link fence in lieu of the decorative "wrought iron" <br />looking aluminum <br />Council agrees with the recommendation to use the wrought iron looking aluminum instead of <br />the chain link fencing. <br />Alternate 5 will not be accepted. <br />^ Alternate 6 - 50' Candle Lighting <br />Mayor Rinker read from the letter "It is my opinion that only if there is a great demand <br />within the community to have night swimming should the pillage accept this alternate." <br />Mayor Rinker asked who wants the lighting. <br />Councilmen Buckholtz and Marquardt are in favor of the lighting; Councilmembers Busa, Cinco, <br />Fixler and Mills are not in favor. <br />Alternate 6 will not be accepted. <br />^ Alternate 7 -Installation of a Diving Well. <br />All Council members are in favor of the installation of a diving well. <br />Alternate #7 will be accepted. <br />Alternates 8, 9 and 10 are mostly aesthetic items to enhance character of development. <br />^ Alternate 8 -Fiber Optic Lighting. <br />Mr. Marquardt said the original concept was to use the underwater lighting for night lighting-- <br />not to be a decorative enhancement. <br />Mayor Rinker said if we are talking about the bookends of the season (where nighttime comes <br />earlier) he wonders if we can enhance the swim time. <br />Mr. Muhlbach said if you have pool lighting you would have 1/2 watt per square foot in the wall <br />of the pool and you would have to achieve 30 foot candles. He tries to stay away from getting <br />electric in the wall. <br />Mr. Marquardt asked the rou~l~ cost of underwater lighting. <br />Mr. Muhlbach said about $30,00. <br />