My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09/27/1999 Meeting Minutes
DOcument-Host
>
Mayfield Village
>
Meeting Minutes
>
1999
>
09/27/1999 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2019 9:13:26 AM
Creation date
7/19/2018 11:10:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Legislation-Meeting Minutes
Document Type
Meeting Minutes
Date
9/27/1999
Year
1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
i <br />Regular Council Meeting <br />9-27-99 <br />Page 8 <br />Roll Call: AYES: All <br />NAYS: None <br />Motion Carried <br />Ordinance Enacted <br /> <br />Third Reading of Ordinance No. 99-28, entitled; "An ordinance authorizing an agreement for <br />the purchase of real estate from the Mayfield United Methodist Church." Introduced by Mayor <br />Rinker and Council as a Whole. (First Reading 9-13-99; Second Reading 9-21-99) <br />Mrs. Cinco, seconded by Mr. Ilacqua, made a motion to enact Ordinance No. 99-28. <br />(Mr. Diemert asked Mrs. Roman to check the actual ordinance because the title on the agenda <br />had included the word emergency. Mrs. Roman checked the ordinance and the word emergency <br />did not appear in the ordinance title. Note: The correct title is reflected in the minutes (as shown <br />above.) <br />Mr. Busa said he wants to go on the record and not be misquoted. I urge my colleagues not to <br />get involved with a Church with internal problems. Bypassing this ordinance, we are directly <br />contributing to the misery of a divided Church congregation. I cannot support an action that <br />subsidizes the Church, the taxpayers money. I believe it is a direct violation of my <br />understanding of the division of Church and State. As a Councilman, I have no desire or <br />intention to jeopardize future administrations or future Councils by performing recklessly. Mr. <br />Busa said he urges-this body not to pass this ordinance. <br />Mayor Rinker said we have covered the bases, but to respond to Mr. Busa's commentary: I think <br />quite the contrary. We have, through this entire process, been very sensitive to our community <br />as well as to the Church community. We have to deal with marketplace and the ordinance and <br />the agreement. The agreement we have worked on for quite a long time represents, I believe, <br />truly an arms length negotiated process that is designed to deal with a lot of issues that are <br />important to us as a community. We look at this as a community obligation. We feel the <br />property on that corner has such significance that it would be shirking our responsibility as the <br />government of this community to allow that property to go way of a piece of real estate in the. <br />marketplace, sold to the highest bidder to do with as they will after a century and a half of the <br />history that this Church has maintained in this community. It is going to be a difficult task for us <br />to look to where the future lies with that parcel. We don't accept this responsibility lightly but it <br />Zs a responsibility aid t~s a~re~mepl re#lects our responsibility to our community. <br />ROLL CALL: AYES: Mr. Buckholtz, Mrs. Cinco, Mr. Ilacqua, <br />Mr. Marquardt, Mrs. Mills and Dr. Parker <br />NAYS: Mr. Busa <br /> <br />1 <br />Motion Carried <br />Ordinance Enacted <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.