Laserfiche WebLink
?etiy ?m'? <br />. v?5 `!?J <br />There were no objections. <br />Council President Spellman stated, there being no objections, the minutes <br />will stand as written. <br />Council President Spellman stated that he and Mayor Beebe have agreed to the <br />following dates regarding the Finance Director appointment; to proceed with <br />the confirmation processo On June 9th Council will meet as the Committee of <br />the Whole in Executive Session to establish a criteria by which they would <br />consider the appointment of a Finance Director solely by his qualif ications. <br />There will then be a meeting on June 15 for the Committee of the Whole to <br />meet in Executive Session for the purpose of interviewing the Mayor's <br />appointee, Mr. Steven Toth. On-J.une 21 a vote will be taken at the Regular <br />Meeting of Council concerning the appointment. He stated a yes vote with <br />four votes means that Mr. Toth is qualified and therefore will be sworn in <br />that evening. If there fails to be four affirmative votes then Mr. Toth is <br />rejected as the appointee. The June 9 and 15 meetings both will be at 7:30 <br />p.m. Council President Spellman stated that Council will meet June 21, 1982 <br />as a Board of Appeals.at 7:30 p.m. to consider the request of the L.N. Gross <br />Company. He stated Ordinance 82-43, introduced by Mayor Beebe confirming the <br />appointment of Mr. Steven Toth and detailing rate of pay will be referred to <br />the Committee of the Who1e for discussion at the June 9 and June 15 meetings. <br />Mayor Beebe commented this is a very orderly and progressive way to make a <br />decision. He feels this is the best approach to the situation. He stated <br />they had an excellent meeting the other evening which he is in total accordance <br />with. <br />Mrs. Bloom stated she will not be able to attend the June 9th meeting. <br />Council President Spellman stated the June 9th meeting will be changed from <br />7:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. as the other members of Council agreed 7:00 would be <br />better. <br />Discussion Rega'rding Beech'Hi11'Road <br />Mrs. Robert Fetzer, 899 Beecfi'Hill'Road - stated the Beech Hill residents met <br />on June 2 to discuss the May 6th letter they received from Mr. Feneli as <br />directed by Council to be sent. She reported the residents arrived at the <br />following decisions: They will not assume the responsibility.for.the maintenance <br />of Village roads. They agreed they would not getition for paving at this time. <br />She stated she is not an official spokesperson for the residents and is stating <br />her opinion only. She said Mr. Feneli's letter stated that Council has determined <br />that it can no longer justify the expenditure of funds for the maintenance and <br />repair of Beech Hill Road. She had a newspaper article of November 19, 1981 <br />regarding Beech Hill and Beechers Brook. Mayor Beebe was quoted as saying; <br />"Money-wise, the cost is minimal. A hundred dollars worth of gravel here and <br />there". Mrs. Fetzer said the residents of Beech Hill know full well that the <br />cost has been minimal and road maintenance has been relatively poor for some <br />time now. She said she does not expect thousands of dollars to be appropriated <br />for Beech Hill Road. She feels their needs are very simple. All they would <br />require is an occasional grading, a little gravel here and there, a dust <br />inhibitor and functional ditches (something that seems to be lacking in some <br />areas, and seemingly lacking in the recently paved north end of Beech Hill Road).