My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06/23/1986 Meeting Minutes
DOcument-Host
>
Mayfield Village
>
Meeting Minutes
>
1986
>
06/23/1986 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2019 9:14:49 AM
Creation date
7/23/2018 4:42:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Legislation-Meeting Minutes
Document Type
Meeting Minutes
Date
6/23/1986
Year
1986
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
87 <br />Mr. Petschauer said if he were to prioritize issues concerning Mayfield <br />Village today, health would be the number one concern. Regarding the <br />comment that this legislative body used as a pawn to rule Cleveland, that <br />can't be any further from the truth. The motivation behind the legislation <br />is to enable the smoker as well as the non-smoker to co-exist in the same <br />environment. He said this is a health issue and an environment issue. He <br />suggested that representatives from the business community sit down with <br />the officials and residents, and discuss the proposed ordinance. <br />Mr. Basile asked if this legislation were passed, if the other members of <br />Council had given any thought to the cost to enforce it. He also asked <br />how much it will cost the businesses and the Uillage. <br />Mr. Goley said they have done some research which indicates the cost of. <br />complying with the ordinance. Other than the cost of posting some signs <br />throughout the businesses, he does not see any.other.costs associated with <br />the implementation of this ordinance. Regarding the cost to the Vill"age, <br />he feels it is pretty much self-enforcing, and said Mayoz Carmen has <br />done some research with the Building Commissioner regarding that. <br /> Mayor Carmen said he checked with the Building Commissioner, (he is not <br /> convinced he is the person to enforece this) but regarding the relative <br /> costs to enforce this legislation, the Building Commissioner felt there <br /> would be no real significant costs associated with this to businesses. <br /> He does nbt know the cost, but after looking at the materials he received <br /> from the businesses, he feels they are in compliance with the ordinance <br /> now. Mayor Carmen said the businesses came here in good faith, and are here <br /> to make money which is a very noble concern. He feels we need to do some <br /> balancing, to balance the in.terests of the community to do those-things <br /> which it feels are appropriate to protect the health, safety, and welfare-- <br /> not only of the people who live here, but also the people who work here. <br /> Mayor Carmen said, in response to Mr. Paris'.:comments, he does not feel the <br /> businesses would move to another town if this ordinanee is enacted. He <br /> feels if the tax base is right, and the safety and service forces are , <br /> right, businesses would not move. Mayor Carmen thinks there are some • <br /> parts of Section E that need revised. He feels the ordinance could be <br /> modified. He said the businesses should consider that the ordinance will <br /> be enacted; the question is then for the businesses to determine what <br /> portions of.Section E they have problems with, and they will be discussed. <br /> Mayor Carmen said he is not sure that the ordinance as it is currently, or <br /> as it may be amended, will be enacted, but feels that it behooves <br /> the businesses to make specific recommendations to those areas which <br /> they feel are inappropriate and how they can be modified before it is <br /> enacted. He said they may want to talk about a voluntary compliance period. <br /> If enough businesses have voluntary programs, which are as. good or better <br /> than our program, there would be no cost to them. To those who say they <br /> oppose another layer of government, he agrees with them. But, there are <br /> some issues.that he feels are so important. He feeTs the specifics of <br /> the ordinance should be discussed, including Section E. <br /> Mr. Etzler said he wanted to report a phone call he received from a man <br /> trom the Ohio Retail Association. The man expressed how many problems <br /> can.be created by limiting a percentage of a restaurant to smoking. <br /> He said that when a vast crowd is Raiting for tables (such as the lunch <br /> crowd) that there may be empty tables, but yet people cannot be provided with
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.