03/25/1980 Meeting Minutes (2) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

~.~~.~. MINUTES OF A SPECIAL MEETING OF COUNCIL Mayfield Village March 25, 1980 The Council of the_Village of Mayfield met iri special session on Tuesday, March 25, 1980 at 8:07 P.M. in the Village Hall. President Alan Bennett presided. - .Present: Messrs., Bennett, Flynn; Spellman and Mrs. Hanus Absent: Messrs., Boger, Carmen and Miss Trask Also Presnet: Mayor Beebe,_ Robert Beatty, Gus Amendola and Dale Feneli Mr. Bennett stated the purpose of the meeting was to consider legis= lation for appropriations for the current year and anyother matter that may home before Council. Mr. Bennett stated that in order to pass the legislation that's be- fore Council; five members have to be present. Miss Trask is expected to arrive around 9:30 P.M. There would be a recess until her arrival. Mr. Feneli commented that since representatives of the DeBartolo Corp. were present and also Mr. Nerely, of Bond Counsel,.~perhaps Cou%acil ,would like to ask them some questions with regard to the legislation before Council.- Since no 'questions were asked of the DeBartolo Representatives, Mr. - Feneli stated, for clarification of what they are proposing, explained to Councilttheir desire to have a deed restriction which would pro- hibit the occupancy of any automotive type services. This is a legal binding method and would work and would be of benefit to the Village if this were the steps they wished to take. Mr. Beatty questioned if the deed restriction would be restrictive enough to assure that the fast food businesses would not be feasible. Mr. Feneli explained that the deed restriction only excludes the use for automotive uses; our present zoning restricts anything but a wholly enclosed restaurant. . Mayor Beebe asked if the ownership changes, would the deed restriction still be valid; Mr. Feneli clarified that the deed restriction.is on the parcel, not on the owner. Mr. Josh Nerely, of Bond Counsel, explained for Council the reason for the change in the figure of $114,500.00 to $101,500.OOoin the legis- lation for -the issuance df :a note. ~-~ He .understood the ."tenative" esti- mate he received from Mr. Hovancsek was the figure to use. After re- viewing the .matter, the figure approved by Council last fall and on file with the Clerk is the lower amount and they prefer to use it. If at the