My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02/16/2004 Meeting Minutes
DOcument-Host
>
Mayfield Village
>
Meeting Minutes
>
2004
>
02/16/2004 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2019 9:26:57 AM
Creation date
7/18/2018 5:42:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Legislation-Meeting Minutes
Document Type
Meeting Minutes
Date
2/16/2004
Year
2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
?j <br />y <br />Regular Council Meeting <br />2-16-04 <br />Page 12 <br />Mr. Saponaro said table until the special meeting is called. Council President Buckholtz said the <br />special meeting, or we will find out tomorrow-and if we need to reconvene, we will reconvene <br />to come to terms with it. <br />Council President Buckholtz asked, any further discussion? <br />There were no comments. <br />ROLL CALL: AYES: All <br />NAYS: None Consideration of Appointment of Agent of Record Tabled. <br />• 12ubbish/Recycling Bid Update <br />Council President Buckholtz asked Mr. Metzung, you are not looking for a motion? <br />Mr. Metzung said no; I am not looking for a motion this evening. I want to discuss the bid <br />summaries. Councilman Marquardt requested knowing what these numbers are. They do <br />represent per home, per month. Mayfield Village has 1,200 homes that we base our bid on so <br />multiply these numbers by 12 and then by 1,200 and it would give you the total for the year. Just <br />going over the bid summary, the first 4 items are for current service on the same days; the J&J <br />Refuse alternate would include changing some days. I don't know that that's an area the Village <br />would be interested in doing. I don't know-understanding how the bids are based--Highland <br />Heights has 3,200 homes that they pick up in 4 days. That is more of a 5-day pick-up as I <br />understand it for most rubbish contractors. Thursday, Highland Heights does 2 routes. That kind <br />of screws up the rubbish company's ability to assign trucks. That is why the J&J Refuse alternate <br />would include changing days. Whether they' d want to change any of our days, I don't know. It <br />may just be a case of they'd want Highland Heights to go to a 5-day. For Highland Heights, the <br />alternate may be significant-as much as $45,000 over the life of the contract. It may be <br />something that they look at. It would be certainly something that we would look at-should that <br />be the case that we don't change anything--and Highland Heights goes to a 5-day pick-up and we <br />look to see what that would leave us-it would leave us approximately $11,000 over the 5 yeaxs <br />of the contract. I've never heard of J&J but they have many references from areas south of <br />Aurora and may be just trying to get into this area. <br />Mr. Metzung said the other item he'd like to discuss tonight is the 96-gallon toter. Bids are fairly <br />close from Waste Management which would be the lowest bid of our regular pick-up so we don't <br />change anything; we are looking at approximately $11,000 over the life of the bid or $2,200 per <br />year to provide the toters. That breaks down to $46/toter for the company to provide toters to <br />each residence. He showed Council a toter. It is easier to store, a more uniform look on the <br />street. Bid specs wouldn't require anyone to have a toter. Should you have a collection that <br />everything doesn't fit into the toter, set it alongside the toter and it will be picked up. The toters <br />come in a smaller size also; residents would have the choice. <br />Mr. Marquardt asked how Waste Management was the cheapest.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.