My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09/19/2016 Meeting Minutes
DOcument-Host
>
Mayfield Village
>
Meeting Minutes
>
2016
>
09/19/2016 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2019 9:28:19 AM
Creation date
7/24/2018 5:00:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Legislation-Meeting Minutes
Document Type
Meeting Minutes
Date
9/19/2016
Year
2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Minutes of the Regular Meeting of Council <br />Monday, September 19, 2016 <br />Page 14 <br />Mr. Wynne stated, that's why we went out to bid the second time. They still came in right under. <br />It's just too close. With this particular project, 70% of the cost of the project is labor and 30% <br />materials. The major component of it is labor. It's too close to mess with and to mess with the <br />Department of Commerce on. <br />Council President Saponaro asked, so we get to a certain threshold and it therefore becomes a <br />prevailing wage project and that is why we have to look at this from a different perspective, <br />correct? <br />Mr. Jerome asked, we still think with that we are going to be under what we budgeted? <br />Mr. Wynne replied, the entire project, yes. For the audience, what prevailing wage means is that <br />on a public project, if it is a renovation or an improvement of an existing facility, the cut-off is <br />$75,000. If it is new construction, like across the street, it is $250,000. What that says is if the <br />contractor hires non-Union labor, they are still required to pay those individuals Union wages. <br />The Union wages in that particular case in a project that goes above that dollar figure. <br />Council President Saponaro stated, thank you Ron for that explanation. Any other discussion <br />points? <br />There were none. <br />Roll Call: AYES: All Motion Carried <br />NAYS: None . Bids Rejected <br />• Motion to authorize expenditure in the amount of $5,563 to PM Graphics for <br />Fall/Winter Community Rec Brochure. <br />Mrs. Mills, seconded by Mr. Jerome, made a motion to authorize expenditure in the amount of <br />$5,563 to PM Graphics for Fall/Winter Community Rec Brochure. <br />Council President Saponaro asked, discussion? <br />There was none. <br />Roll Call: AYES: All Motion Carried <br />NAYS: None Expenditure Authorized <br />• Motion to go out to bid for the sale of police vehicles. <br />Mrs. Mills, seconded by Mr. Marrie, made a motion to go out to bid for the sale of police <br />vehicles. <br />Council President Saponaro asked, discussion? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.