My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06/04/2012 Meeting Minutes
DOcument-Host
>
Mayfield Village
>
Meeting Minutes
>
2012
>
06/04/2012 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2019 9:28:50 AM
Creation date
7/24/2018 5:28:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Legislation-Meeting Minutes
Document Type
Meeting Minutes
Date
6/4/2012
Year
2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Minutes of the Special Meeting of Council <br />Monday, June 4, 2012 <br />Page 7 <br />Mr. Cannatta replied, and then the easement is extinguished. We can't come back on. That's <br />generally what happens. You wouldn't want a permanent easement. <br />Mr. Kinnaird understands that. As long as this is two stories and sta.ys not above two stories. I <br />am good with that. <br />Michael Gatto <br />29010 Chardon Road <br />That's one of the agreements that we have. It is two stories. We will keep it at two stories. We <br />will be able to build screening to reasonable satisfaction. We talked for quite some time about <br />reasonable. There's more of an issue between you guys than there is between us. We are going <br />to need the construction easement to get on there, do some mounding, depending on whether or <br />not we can get a vaxiance taller than 6 foot, that would determine the height of the property. If <br />it's a one story in the back or a two story in the back, that's going to also determine a variance on <br />screening height. Basically, we are in agreement that we are going to work things. We both <br />understand. We are both on the same page. As we go forward and lay out the plans for the back <br />buildings, even the front buildings, this will become more prevalent and more discussion will be <br />had. We are kind of in agreement on this. As we lay out the plans for all of the drainage and <br />easements, like you said, we will be able to work all this into it. <br />Council President Buckholtz stated, well, while you are both standing there, it's a perfect time <br />and then we will give Mr. Kinnaird the fmal opportunity to affirm wanting to withdraw if that's <br />what you choose to do. I just wanted to echo what Dave Hartt said, that there are certain <br />stipulations and conditions already in there that were done at BZA, isn't that correct? That's <br />what you are referring to, Mr. Gatto in terms of, there's already a Development Agreement. My <br />uriderstanding is as you firm up the aciual footprint of the property which will happen with P&Z, <br />again there will be stipulations. <br />Mr. Gatto replied, exactly. <br />Council President Buckholtz asked if there were any other comments. <br />Ms. Calta asked Mr. Kinnaird, I just wanted to make sure that we are understanding that you <br />have withdrawn your appeal. <br />Mr. Kinnaird replied, yes. Reluctantly. But I am putting my trust in these guys that they are <br />going to come through. I am not happy about the 20 feet off of my back property line because of <br />, the mature trees that won't ever be able to be replaced there. I would like to see it back further, <br />the parking anyways, from 20 feet to 40 feet, just to leave a few of those trees in there. I <br />understand when they do come in there, I would like to see with the two stages of this, to leave <br />some of those woods in there if possible until the second phase is on its way, just to leave that <br />more of a buffer for a longer period of time.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.