My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/24/2014 Meeting Minutes
DOcument-Host
>
Mayfield Village
>
Meeting Minutes
>
2014
>
11/24/2014 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2019 9:29:06 AM
Creation date
7/24/2018 5:43:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Legislation-Meeting Minutes
Document Type
Meeting Minutes
Date
11/24/2014
Year
2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Minutes of the Special Meeting of <br />Planning and Zoning, Council, Architectural <br />Review Board and Citizens Advisory Committee <br />Page 9 <br />opposite side. That would give you better access to the party-end of the thing and segregate <br />the smaller meeting room to the west side. It doesn't flow with me as far as the utilization. <br />Thinking of people entering and going in to the room for party purposes and the restrooms <br />being over at the other end. <br />A: I saw the meeting rooms as being the destination. If you enter the building, you are going to <br />walk through what you need to walk through to get to the place that provides why you are <br />there. The relationship of the meeting room to the green would be the most important <br />relationship of the whole building. I don't disagree that the bathrooms might be disconnected <br />a bit, but like we said, we have to work through all those details. <br />Q: Are you talking about the meeting rooms on the right side? I am talking about the ones <br />centrally located. They ought to be moved over to the left side and the restrooms and other <br />facilities put centrally located to service both sides with more efficiency and provide your <br />restrooms closer to the green portion of it than where they are now. <br />Mayor: What we are talking about is we need to look at different floor plans; different ways the space <br />is. Does it make sense to move on the second option where we relocate the building or not? <br />There are certain strategic aspects. <br />Q: It's hard to tell from here, but the two rooms, is the partition movable? Can that be made into <br />one huge area? <br />A: Not as drawn right now. <br />Q: How many square feet do you have in the big room? <br />A: This is about 1600 square feet. The smaller room is 800-900 feet. <br />Q: In comparison to the existing facility, how does that lay out? <br />A: The same. The 1600 is the distance. How does this improve the Town Square idea? Do we <br />like providing a better traffic flow and sharing parking, making it more efficient for both <br />parties? The floor plans were a preliminary concept to fall under this roof basically. <br />Q: But the floor plan itself for the existing building, you don't have as many options at all. <br />A: That's correct. <br />Q: So if we are going to renovate this, you are limited. You need to make sure everyone <br />understands that moving this and putting this here and doing all that, that's for a new building. <br />We are much more limited if we keep the existing structure and renovate it. <br />Mayor: That's basically true. They would be flipping the kitchen, keeping the restrooms in the same <br />area. There's only some permeations that it seems to lend itself too. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.