My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09/16/2013 Meeting Minutes
DOcument-Host
>
Mayfield Village
>
Meeting Minutes
>
2013
>
09/16/2013 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2019 9:29:18 AM
Creation date
7/24/2018 6:11:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Legislation-Meeting Minutes
Document Type
Meeting Minutes
Date
9/16/2013
Year
2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br />Minutes of the Regular Meeting of <br />Monday, August.l9, 2013 <br />Page 11 <br />Council President Buckholtz asked <br />Mr. Delguyd explained, when we first <br />that they would pay 80% of the full <br />estimate because that's an option they <br />them and told them that ODOT requ <br />They said yes, thereby reducing our lia <br />Council President Buckholtz asked, <br />the 80% participation from NOACA. <br />lid the estimates, NOACA, the funding organization, said <br />cost. They luckily did not say 80% of the engineer's <br />;an give. By saying 80% of the full cost, we then went to <br />red we have vehicle-ready access over the boardwalks. <br />came through? <br />Mr. Delguyd replied, they came throu'gh. At the end of the day, it's $50,000. I won't say it's <br />nothing, but the project is ready to go with some of the right of ways. We have rerouted. There's <br />a lot of work that have gone in to thisI. From a finance standpoint, the money is all there. It's <br />already set aside. It will probably be a little more with overruns but that is to be expected with <br />these iypes of projects. Anyone else have any comments on that? <br />Council President Buckholtz asked, they are putting up a million dollars? <br />Mr. Delguyd replied, they are puttirig up a million dollars. Over a million. 80% of the <br />$1,334,000. Council President Buckholtz stated, 'yery good. Comments? Questions? I know there are <br />additional expenditures ciown the road: The trail will be an ongoing proj ect in terms of lighting or whatever the public use is. Certain amenities aze not included? <br />Mr. Delguyd replied, as of right now, <br />have the equipment because they plo, <br />not planning to light it. We are not r <br />daytime usage. There will be signag <br />thing in a case so nobody can use i <br />striping on this. <br />Mr. Metzung replied, there is a center <br />Mr. Delguyd stated, okay, so every <br />Council President Buckholtz asked, <br />Mr. Delguyd replied, yes. The only i <br />under SOM Center Road, so at some <br />that's maybe 10 years down the road. <br />1e only ongoing maintenance will be plowing. We already <br />our current trails. In terms of lighting at this point, we are <br />inning to encourage that type of usage. It's meant to be a <br />up that says, "Park closes". You can't enclose the whole <br />but there will be proper signage. Are we going to put <br />yes. <br />years we will have to restripe it. <br />many of these projects, the public will dictate usage? <br />:able additional expense is it is a natural connection <br />the Sewer District decides fix the creek erosion, but <br />Mayor Kinker added, a project like tliis does not happen overnight. In recent history, when we <br />submitted the original application, tlie TLCI funding which really comes out of Washington, <br />ODOT is the conduit for those dollars, ODOT's specifications are really very exacting. Each <br />time we have gone to these meetings at NOACA last year and this year, what struck us when the <br />;
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.