My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/12/2015 Meeting Minutes
DOcument-Host
>
Mayfield Village
>
Meeting Minutes
>
2015
>
01/12/2015 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2019 9:29:33 AM
Creation date
7/24/2018 6:38:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Legislation-Meeting Minutes
Document Type
Meeting Minutes
Date
1/12/2015
Year
2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Minutes of the Organizational Meeting of Council <br />Monday, January 12, 2015 - <br />Page 10 <br />Ms. Wolgamuth added, it was a new thing. It was the transportation company which is separate <br />from the Community Partnership. They retain the transportation coinpany. <br />Council President Buckholtz stated, maybe we have to ask who bridges that gap. That's a gap in <br />service. <br />Mr. Jerome asked, what is our thought on the transportation? It's not worth the money? No one <br />is using it? <br />Ms. Wolgamuth replied, the transportation numbers are down but we don't really have the option <br />to opt out of it. It's an all or nothing. We are in the Community Partnership doing everything or <br />we are not. It's not ala carte. <br />Mrs. Mills stated, usually Stacy comes to the meeting. She wasn't at our meeting this past week. <br />The Commission asked Bill to ask her some questions. We try to stay on top of it as far as the <br />seniors, but there's only so much we can do at a meeting. It's what Bill is saying. It's up to the <br />Partnership to get out and talk to these people somehow, someway. I don't know how you would <br />do that. <br />Council President Buckholtz stated, you tell them that it passed by a slim vote because we are <br />looking for participation. <br />Mr. Saponaro stated, I don't think there's lack of people who would want to utilize it. It's really <br />how does it work and to your point if it is more work because they can't get their wheelchair in, <br />it becomes a deterrent and then people talk and will not do it. <br />Request for architectural services and construction management in connection <br />with construction of tlxe Comanunity Room (T'hen Design -$95,000). <br />Ms. Wolgamuth reported, there was a memo in your packets. We got the change in scope to <br />document the agreement that changes it from the rehab of the old building to a raze and rebuild. <br />Obviously the numbers are substantially different. I didn't know if that seemed appropriate. I <br />spoke to John Marrelli and Ron DiNardo and they both thought that was an appropriate number. <br />Mr. DiNardo stated, that number is in line with what is customary, 5-7% range. <br />Mr. Marrelli stated, I seem to remember last time when we were going through the police station <br />production that the numbers were higher as far as percentage. I thouglnt it was more like 10% or <br />12% of the total cost. <br />Mr. DiNardo replied, that was on a larger job with more work. This is a smaller job. <br />Mr. Marrelli stated, it seemed to be in line. <br />Ms. Wolgamuth stated, if you remember, when we went through the bid process, they were the <br />low bid at $29,400. Some of the bids we got in for the rehab were in the $80,000-90,000 range, <br />just for the remodeling. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.