My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04/04/2011 Meeting Minutes (2)
DOcument-Host
>
Mayfield Village
>
Meeting Minutes
>
2011
>
04/04/2011 Meeting Minutes (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2019 9:30:03 AM
Creation date
7/24/2018 7:47:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Legislation-Meeting Minutes
Document Type
Meeting Minutes
Date
4/4/2011
Year
2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Minutes of the Special Meeting of Council <br />4-4-11 <br />Page 13 <br />- OPEN PORTION <br />The public is limited to 5 minutes and are asked to only address Council with <br />information new or different to what has already been testified to at the Board of <br />Zoning Appeals Hearing and/or to note their collective opposition or support on the <br />record. <br />Let's move on to the option portion and again, I want to restate what that was all about. It's 5 <br />minutes, strictly 5 minutes. Anyone that would like to address Council, and again that is <br />addressing Council, not each other or the people, the interested parties here and also I will ask <br />and again it's human nature, everybody may want to, although we didn't swear in a lot of people, <br />do you feel that the public needs to be sworn in? If so, we can do it as you come up if you <br />haven't done it already. But if it's of the same nature, if it's repetitious, then we'll stop you and <br />ask you just how many people feel that way? It's not like taking a vote, it's just getting your <br />name in the record as how you feel. So who would like to begin? State your name and address, <br />please. <br />Dave Robinson <br />654 Meadowood <br />I'm the neighbor on the other side. ? We moved, my wife and two kids moved into the 654 <br />Meadowood address in 2007. I would just like to say, I don't feel, obviously both structures <br />were up when we moved in and I don't feel like it devalued the property or the realtor didn't <br />mention anything to me. We have been fine with both structures. They are in plain view of our <br />family room where we live, so in the back part of our house we have full view of both structures <br />and aren't bothered by it and I would almost feel, I don't know if this has been brought up or not, <br />but there's one of the smaller structures where he keeps the wood to heat his house in the winter. <br />I would feel that would be more of a deterrent if that was taken down and there was tons of wood <br />everywhere with covers on it or tarp over it. I just feel that would be less attractive or possibly <br />devalue it even more than the structures he has up now. Just on my end, because I'm the <br />neighbor on the other side, I have not been bothered by either structure. <br />Council President Buckholtz stated, thank you very much. Anyone else? Okay, if there's no <br />more public comment, I would just ask for comments or questions if anyone has any on Council. <br />There were none. No questions or comments is not a sign of lack of interest. We have been <br />inundated with material that we are still going through. Yes, ma'am? , <br />From the audience, I have a question. Council President Buckholtz stated, can you come up to <br />the mic, if it's not inconvenient for you. <br />Sandy Pangonis <br />660 Meadowood <br />I live at 660 Meadowood which is two houses up from Tim and Lynne and I know I spoke at the <br />other hearing. I don't have a problem at all with their dwelling, but my question to the Council
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.