My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04/04/2011 Meeting Minutes (2)
DOcument-Host
>
Mayfield Village
>
Meeting Minutes
>
2011
>
04/04/2011 Meeting Minutes (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2019 9:30:03 AM
Creation date
7/24/2018 7:47:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Legislation-Meeting Minutes
Document Type
Meeting Minutes
Date
4/4/2011
Year
2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Minutes of the Special Meeting of Council <br />4-4-11 <br />Page 14 <br />is, does the fact that Ms. Bernstein's mother never objected to this dwelling, does that have any <br />relevance to the argument? <br />Council President Buckholtz can't really answer on the spot. It's a collective opinion here. We <br />will be reaching a collective decision. Duly noted. It's a good point that you raised, something <br />that we would take under consideration, but I'm not sure. What it comes down to is 2 or 3 <br />decisions that were made by another legal body of the Village. So really we are looking to some <br />kind of resolution on whether to accept, refute or modify those decisions that have been <br />previously made. <br />Ms. Pangonis stated, it appears to me that you can look back at things that happened years and <br />years ago and object to them now and it's something that happened a long time ago. It kind of <br />seems like an odd situation to me that her mother didn't object, why is she objecting? The other <br />point is I don't think that taking that property down, I'm not a realtor but I know about realty, <br />houses and homes in the neighborhood. There's no way that taking that building down is going <br />to put her house value up to $450,000 so she can recoup all that money. It's just not possible. <br />It's not realistic at all. <br />Council President Buckholtz thanked Ms. Pangonis for her thoughts. <br />Mr. Saponaro asked Ms. Calta, do you have an opinion on that Diane in terms of the lack of <br />objection by Mrs. Spuzzillo? <br />Ms. Calta replied, I would just note that the fact that a neighbor does not object does not change <br />the nature of a Code violation. If there's a Code violation, there's a Code violation. It can't be <br />waived by agreement of a neighbor. Certainly there are circumstances where neighbors would <br />consent in the event of a need for a variance from a Code that's taken into consideration in that <br />context. But when there is a Code violation, there is a Code violation. It can't be waived. Mr. <br />Marrelli would look at it strictly as a Code violation. <br />Howard Bernstein <br />The structure was there when Mrs. Spuzzillo was alive. It was half the size. And, there's 11 <br />years of construction. Is there any time when construction has to come to an end? Would you <br />buy a house next to total construction for 11 years? When is enough enough? And it's a shame <br />because the work is nice work. It's a11 good looking stuff. But when does it end? Does it ever <br />end? Can you build just forever and ever? <br />Council President Buckholtz thanked Mr. Bernstein. Anyone else? <br />. Casey Kucharson <br />6564 Hunt Circle <br />Quite honestly, I don't really care about the outcome here between the two parties. The only <br />thing I would ask Council to consider, I'm on Ordinance Review Committee. I have had these
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.