Laserfiche WebLink
Minutes of a Public Hearing <br />On Proposed Charter Review Revisions <br />8-10-10 <br />Page 9 <br />What this ordinance would do is let the final decision on whether or not property <br />should be rezoned in the hands of the Planning Commission after public hearings, <br />advertising and debating and recommendations to Council, Council having public <br />hearings, mandatory three readings on the ordinance and then a vote of the <br />Council and when Council makes their decision, the public still has the right to <br />circulate petitions within 30 days to call for a referendum and put it on the ballot <br />even if Council voted for it. If no such petitions were circulated, then Council's <br />decision would become final. <br />If Council felt in the course of their public hearings that it is was a little <br />controversial, that it was an area very sensitive, that it was something that maybe <br />the public should make a decision on, the recommendations of the Charter <br />Review Commission say that Council can then, as an option, send it to the voters <br />and let the voters make the final decision on whether or not the property should be <br />rezoned or the use changed. <br />It seems to be a recommendation to get current with current times. Whatever was <br />going on in the 80's is no longer a threat to the citizens of the Village of Mayfield, <br />to eliminate court battles, to eliminate the shying away of businesses from this <br />community because they may have to get referendum zoning. Those are the <br />reasons behind why they wanted to have it. The only bad part of it is that some <br />citizens feel like it's a little harder now for them to get this on the ballot or it's a <br />little harder for them to get a chance to have a say so. On the other hand, the <br />public is fully included in the process, so they felt there was enough protection in <br />that situation. <br />4. ORDINANCE NO. 2010-25 <br />The Mayor's absence from the community. <br />This has been in there since 1974. What it called for before is when the Mayor is <br />absent from the municipality or for any reason is unable to perform his duties, the <br />President of Council shall become the Acting Mayor. <br />In 1974, we did not have horse and buggies, but still most of the mayors were <br />close at hand. They didn't have cellphones and fax machines and e-mails as <br />sophisticated as they were back then. A Mayor can actually be absent from <br />Mayfield Village and still run the community by reason of the fact that he is in <br />South Euclid or Mayfield Heights or Gates Mills or anywhere else. He is not <br />unable to do his job. It seemed like this is out of date at this point where his <br />absence from the municipality automatically brings in the President of Council. <br />Because why? If the Mayor doesn't work in the Village and the President of