My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05/09/2005 Meeting Minutes
DOcument-Host
>
Mayfield Village
>
Meeting Minutes
>
2005
>
05/09/2005 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2019 9:30:37 AM
Creation date
7/24/2018 8:44:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Legislation-Meeting Minutes
Document Type
Meeting Minutes
Date
5/9/2005
Year
2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Special Council Minutes <br />5/9/OS <br />Page 7 <br />SLIDE: Objectives Used in P1anning Process <br />Mayor Rinker said these objectives were again the process of working with a number of Village <br />residents in conjunction with C.S.U. and I will take them all briefly: expanding Recreation; <br />controlling traffic; dealing with the zoning; we wanted high quality development. We knew that there <br />were some Wetlands but we didn't know quite the extent at that point that is why we had "Shaker <br />Lakes" as opposed to the Wetland Preserve today. We had stormwater issues with the drainages <br />through the area. Progressive is actually on a watershed between the Chagrin and the Euclid Creek <br />drainages. We wanted-and it was very important to keep our population which has really remained <br />at 3,500 really since the `70s. We wanted to improve the income and property tax base; maintain <br />lower income tax and property tax rates; maintain a rural residential character; maintain a positive <br />revenue stream for our school district and levels of service for our residents--trying to achieve a <br />balance between ultimately often competing interests. <br />SLIDE: What is Layercake Zoning? <br />Mayor Rinker said this is the infamous Layercake Zoning that the courts told us we had to stick to. <br />Some of you may recall, in 1994, we went to a referendum vote to rezone this area to conventional <br />single-family residential development which was the only zoning we had until recently. The property <br />owners, having gone to court previously-succeeded in securing first a preliminary and then a <br />permanent injunction keeping the Village from going ahead with its referendum vote. We never got <br />the results of the vote but we are pretty certain that it probably passes. But we handed with the <br />proverbial, "Fait Accompli " of what to do with it. Layercake Zoning (it is kind of hard to see here) is <br />this green band (think of green icing) is all residential zoning. Highland Road; S.O.M. Center Road <br />and White Road. The first band in, the yellow, is the office/laboratory (which in our code is our <br />SLIDE: Northwest Quadrant Zoning Must Remain Layercake <br />Mayor Rinker said this is just repeating what I had said a moment ago about the legal decisions <br />impacting the Layercake Zoning. Again, this was all part of the presentation we made back in <br />1997. <br />SLIDE: Land Redistribution Improves Use <br />Mayor Rinker said I thought this was a good visual. The golf course we purchased with an option <br />which we exercised in 1997-right at the time we announced this project and Progressive bought <br />highest and best commercial usage.) The logic of the Layercake is that adjacent to a residential, it is a <br />more favorable type of use because you have some aesthetic controls; it is a cleaner business and <br />generally speaking it is a softer commercial use adjacent to a residential. And then a more intensive, <br />less friendly adjacent to a residential is the Warehouse-Distribution. Along I-271 where it takes <br />advantage of that kind of commercial arterial, you see that in Euclid; you see that in Willoughby; <br />they have more retail components but generally it's the same idea. We have a lot of it in Beta Park <br />(which we've learned has really been kind of a dinosaur from our standpoint in terms of an economic <br />engine.) What the proposal gave us the first chance to do was "x" this out entirely; remove <br />Warehouse-Distribution as a component of this development and concentrate strictly on the Office- <br />Laboratory. So if you look at this and think about if you shove that blue off the map and expand the <br />green and the yellow; that is pretty much what we have achieved today. Out of about 306 acres, <br />viriually half are either residential or public lands and by operation of law, Village lands are treated <br />as residential classification. And then the other half, it is close to within a couple of acres-the other <br />half would be as projected an Office-Laboratory development.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.