Laserfiche WebLink
ia-i7-oi <br />Page 16 <br />feedback that you can get, the more people understand what's at issue, I think the healthier the <br />discussion, the better ideas that we are going to get. Ultimately, this is the kind of issue that could <br />be amenable to a petition filed by voters directly. Council does not make the decision, under our <br />Charter; as you know, this is a Referendum issue regardless. All Council really would be doing <br />would be to facilitate by identifying this is a particular ordinance, kind of giving it a serial number if <br />you will, what it is. Tonight, Mr. Schiemann has an opporiunity to lay on the record at least a lot of <br />his preliminary ideas. I think that the questioning from here will be useful for everyone because it <br />will help identify the kinds of issues that should be discussed henceforward. <br />Mr. Schiemann said I have presented Council with a basic package that starts with identifying the 3 <br />parcels. There are photos of the 3 parcels with addresses and permanent parcel numbers there. A113 <br />are older houses--50, 60, 70+ years old in the Village. Many of them, it has been expressed to me <br />and to others, as being eyesores in the Village. I think you can simply take a look at some of the <br />pictures with the trash and the overgrown conditions, etc., I think we can achieve something much <br />nicer in the Village. On the second page is a map of the Village simply identifying the three parcels, <br />where they sit on Wilson Mills Road between the Cemetery and the Church. They are landlocked, <br />basically backed up to the parking lot at Heinen's to the Cemetery on the other side. There is a small <br />drawing of basically a building that would be like the dentist next door, that I took down and <br />proposed to Bruce that basically says here's how much building we could put up and we could pave <br />it all the way out to Wilson Mills and make it look like the dental building over here, nothing but <br />pavement up in front of it. During that discussion, Mayor Rinker suggested wouldn't it be neat to <br />turn the building sideways, to let the building back up to the Cemetery. And possibly use the <br />existing parking that is already there; there is enough paveinent there already. This drawing is <br />proposed with the building butting up to the Cemetery. If you see where the existing curb cut is <br />(where the dotted lines are drawn), that actually as Mayor Rinker proposed, could be grass which <br />would be 105' of green space; you could do a little circle with a gazebo thing and a spider cobweb <br />off to the doors of the building off of that little gazebo thing. It could be a nice, beautiful gazebo- <br />type area. I was initially thinking office building; be it professional offices or whatever. Mayor <br />Rinker suggested wouldn't it be neat and wouldn't everybody love an upscale restaurant in the <br />Village as part of a project like this. Wouldn't, if you attended the Candidate's Night that we had <br />here, it was directly proposed that wouldn't it be great to have one of those Arabica-type coffee <br />shops, or wouldn't it be great to have something--that was basically Mayor Rinker's idea as to what <br />else could be done on this property if we turned the building sideways and left some grassy area and <br />did something unique with the parcel. I am a 22-year resident of the Village. I want to do what's <br />right for the Village; this is a project but in essence what we are looking for is to do what's right <br />down the road. If I could analogize what I think we are doing here tonight, being a CPA and an <br />attorney, I think of the tax code quite often and the tax code says we have to file tax returns. There <br />are certainly people who can buy a piece of rental property and use the depreciation to their benefit <br />and other governmental employees who can use a 403B plan to their benefit and corporate <br />employees who can use a 401k plan to their benefit. The tax law provides other remedies for people <br />to use, likewise our Charter provides other remedies for hardship areas. This is basically, I think Joe <br />Diemert would agree, that if I was sitting on June 17 instead of December 17, I could make the <br />November ballot with little or no problem. The issue is, effective today, Village Council basically <br />stops operating until sometime in late January. Planning and Zoning effectively does not meet until <br />February. Those things are basically stopped. That becomes a hardship on this project; it becomes a <br />hardship on getting this to the May ballot in a timely manner. All putting this on the agenda for a