Laserfiche WebLink
Memo re Request for Special Use Permit <br />at 731 Beta from Mayor Rinker 4-12-00 <br />Page 4 <br />The steps I mention below are thus only a suggested strategy for us to move into <br />a position to address the potential of any sunilar requests in the future; it is also a <br />' strategy that can steer and influence whether such requests are made in the first place, <br />much less how they will be made and be handled by the Village. <br />Step Two - Medium Range Assessment of Beta Pazk and Relevant Planning and <br />Zoning Code Ordinances. <br />I ask that we collectively pose the questions: What dces Beta Park mean to the <br />Village; to what extent need we, or should we make any adjustment to it? I am not <br />advocating change of Beta Park, simply because I do not know if it needs any change; <br />however, I am advocating we undertake a methodical way of evaluating its important <br />characteristics to see if any change is warranted. The present permit issue implies this <br />should be a worthwhile exercise. From time to time, not just recently, we have <br />encountered issues that prompt us to look to Beta in the context of Mayfield Village's <br />tax base and commerc.ial make-up. This present issue has simply triggered in my mind <br />a series of questions that I find are not readily answered. I therefore think we should <br />collectively develop some strategies and create an analytical model of Beta that will <br />enable us to profile it and see where and how we may wish to steer it in the future. <br />Thus, I think that between the Finance Committee, the Ordinance Review <br />\ Committee, the Planning and Zoning Commission, the Finance Director and with some <br />'- pointed consultation with our Planiung Consultant we can collectively find useful ways <br />to develop the profile. <br />The one example that came to mind in the course of these recent discussions is <br />whether we should need to make any adjustment to the off-street parking ordinances. <br />Such ordinances are premised upon certain assumptions that correlate traffic and <br />parking needs with a particular zoning use. In my experience, I have seen how these <br />assumptions have evolved and have been treated in municipal settings in a variety of <br />ways, ranging from rank manipulation to thoughtful and even sophisticated evaluation <br />of growing and changing databases. In some instances, the assumptions have been <br />markedly changed; in other instances, the changes have been more subtle. (One notable <br />area has involved shopping malls and the parking ratios that correlate parlcing with <br />gross leaseable area within malls, which in turn is tempered by distance of parking <br />space from retail service within the mall, the kind of service situated in the mall and the <br />mix of retail services inside any given mall. Over the years, the philosophy of shopping <br />centers has changed as a:reflection of the changing demographics of consumers, <br />shopping habits and the frequency and timing of traffic and trips generated by these <br />usesJ This stuff can get pretty thick, but the fact remains communities all over the <br />? greater Qeveland area are at different stages and in different ways rethinldng such <br />ordinances.