My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/25/2002 Meeting Minutes
DOcument-Host
>
Mayfield Village
>
Meeting Minutes
>
2002
>
11/25/2002 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2019 9:31:31 AM
Creation date
7/24/2018 9:51:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Legislation-Meeting Minutes
Document Type
Meeting Minutes
Date
11/25/2002
Year
2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
PRD Meeting <br />11-25-02 <br />Page 9 <br />family units that were, oh, identical-looking units and pretty much shared like a sideyard, <br />courtyard type of deal with 14' of sideyard between them. <br />Mr. Samac said that pretty much concludes the shots that I have. I hope it refreshes your <br />memory a little bit. What I'd like to do now is to briefly go through Chapter 1159 as proposed <br />and recommended by Planning Commission. And there are several points that I would like to <br />bring out, and especially those areas that Planning voted on as far as numbers are concerned for <br />density and setbacks and what have you and a few other areas just as general comments and <br />information. <br />Mr. Samac said I have a couple of comments on the first page here but I would like to wait and <br />do them sort of toward the end. But if you'd look on your proposed zone classification under <br />1159.03; (it's on page 2), one of the things I did want to point out was 1159.03 under Permitted <br />Uses, the Planning Commission recommended that there belimited-that the single-family <br />attached units, the clustered units, be limited to no more than 3 attached units before you have a <br />break between others. Under those permitted uses, of course, the regular or standard-type single- <br />familyhome would be permitted and detached cluster of single-family homes along with <br />attached single-family dwellings. So, that pretty much covers everything that is out there. <br />Again, their maximum number of attached units that they would like to see was limited to 3 units <br />attached. <br />Mr. Samac said the next Section, under 1159.05.... <br />Dr. Parker asked, Bernie, could I ask you one quick question? (Bernie said yes.) Was there any <br />discussion as to 2 versus 3 versus 4-I mean, what was their thinking as to why not just 2 <br />attached unitsor.... <br />Mr. Samac replied, I am sure we had some discussion upon that-a lot of discussion but I think <br />ultimately what they settled on was like no more than 3 attached units as their recommendation. <br />Some of the ones that we'd seen are 4 attached; there's a few in there that probably have 5 or 6 <br />units attached-but most of what you see out there are twos, threes and fours. You know, <br />depending on the design, the height and that sort of thing, I might see where almost any number <br />could fit depending on certain circumstances.... <br />Dr. Parker said okay; I just wondered if it was like split half and half; half thought maybe we <br />should go with 2, half thought we should go with 3 and there was some compromise or what. . <br />Mr. Marquardt said I don't think there was much argument on that one. <br />Mr. Samac said I don't think so. There may have been.... <br />Several people spoke at once. <br />Mr. Marquardt said that wasn't something that was voted on. Everyone was in agreement. <br />Dr. Parker said great. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.