My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05/19/2003 Meeting Minutes
DOcument-Host
>
Mayfield Village
>
Meeting Minutes
>
2003
>
05/19/2003 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2019 9:31:48 AM
Creation date
7/24/2018 10:07:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Legislation-Meeting Minutes
Document Type
Meeting Minutes
Date
5/19/2003
Year
2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Regular Council Meeting <br />5-19-03 <br />Page 15 <br />Council President Buckholtz asked, discussion? <br />Mr. Marquardt said I have to express my opinion that this would be better handled as a <br />referendum issue to rezone this property rather than a special use permit. <br />Council President Buckholtz asked, any further discussion? This was voted-where, Bernie-at <br />P&Z? <br />Mr. Samac said yes; P&Z recommended it. <br />Mrs. Cinco said and Diane Calta explained how we can use the conditional use permit in this <br />situation. <br />Mr. Riter asked Council President Buckholtz, isn't a conditional use permit meant for using an <br />existing-isn't its true intent to allow for the use of an existing building for a use that that <br />building wasn't intended for rather than taking a piece of property and causing it to be used in a <br />different fashion-I mean isn't that more of a zoning change for that property? <br />Ms. Calta said I would agree that conditional uses have been used with the example that you <br />have given. However, your code has given you the authority to-in the event there's actually a <br />vacant parcel to allow a conditional use permit to create a building and allow a use for that <br />building. <br />Mr. Riter said realistically, what company is going to build a hotel knowing that 3 years from <br />now we can revoke the use. I was at the first Planning and Zoning meeting when they brought <br />up building a hotel. And the developer of the hotel said absolutely; we wouldn't build this if we <br />knew that 3 years from now the Village could revoke this. <br />Ms. Calta said that is exactly one of the questions that Planning Commission had. And Mr. <br />Diemert answered that in a very detailed letter. One of the questions was, essentially, if this is a <br />conditional use permit that is reviewed, how permanent is it? The opinion that Mr. Diemert gave <br />is that it is a conditional use permit with conditions attached. So long as those conditions are <br />complied with that use continues. Effectively, automatically, renewed so long as those <br />conditions are complied with. Just like any building permit or other permit, it is reviewed to, <br />make sure it is in compliance with its use. You'd be doing the same thing. <br />Mr. Marquardt said this could have been accomplished with a use change by a zoning change. <br />Ms. Calta said with a rezoning of the property; yes. I can't speak to whether or not it could <br />actually be rezoned. <br />Council President Buckholtz said if I may echo something that happened a few years back. <br />Some doctors, some physicians wanted to come into a building on Beta in the same type of <br />situation. Granted, it is an interesting point you bring up, it was a pre-existing building as <br />opposed to raw property. and, I too attended that meeting and I know one of the things
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.