My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2018 010 Ordinance
DOcument-Host
>
Mayfield Village
>
Ordinances Resolutions
>
2018 Ordinances
>
2018 010 Ordinance
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2019 10:59:24 AM
Creation date
3/22/2019 4:17:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Legislation-Meeting Minutes
Document Type
Ordinance
Number
010
Date
2/19/2018
Year
2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
103
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
P & Z Minutes <br />Feb 5, 2018 <br />Pg #7 <br />Thomas Jones states, the first set of plans that was submitted to the first workshop meeting, we <br />included that landscape plan as part of our overall package. <br />Mr. Saponaro said, so we do have that somewhere. But we didn't look at it as a Village to try to <br />put a monetary value to it7 <br />Mr. Marrelli replied, no Sir. <br />Chairman Syracuse said, we can encompass all this into the motion which at this time I would <br />entertain a motion to approve the final site, landscape and lighting plan for ARTIS Senior <br />Living East Commons subject to; <br />• The Village Engineer and Fire Chief's approval. <br />e The Development Agreement being finalized between the applicant and Mayfield <br />Village. <br />• Mr. Kinnaird's reasonable approval & execution of an Agreement to meet the <br />condition satisfactory to Council prior to their vote on it, that the condition thaf goes <br />along with the "USE" Variance is being met. <br />Mr. Fikaris said, in speaking with 1VIr. Kinnaird, I believe his sentiment was that he wanted to <br />get an idea of what something like this would cost. I think he's bouncing this off of somebody <br />to see what $10,000 in landscaping would buy him. It's unfortunate with the timing that he <br />doesn't have that answer. But I don't believe necessarily that his viewpoint is being <br />unreasonable, he's just trying to get a value of what his $10,000 gets hirn. <br />Mr. Saponaro said, but Mr. Marrelli said that Mr. Kinnaird said today he thought the $10,000 <br />or $11,000 wasn't going to cut it. <br />Chairman Syracuse said, what I stated in the motion, was that we would approve it subject to <br />Mr. Kinnaird's reasonable approval. That could be left to Council to decide at the meeting that <br />Council would take a vote to approve this. <br />Dr. Parker said, it doesn't seem like it should be that difficult for a Landscape Architect to <br />come in and figure this out fairly easily and fairly quickly, so I'm not quite sure what the <br />holdup is. The other thing, will someone express to Mr. Kinnaird that if he can't come up with <br />his answer, that Council will be making the decision for him? <br />Chairnnan Syracuse replied, that will be in our minutes from tonight's meeting. It's unfortunate <br />that Mr. Kinnaird is not in attendance tonight to address these issues. He's certainly welcome to <br />review these minutes and speak with anyone within the Building Dept, Engineering Dept or the <br />Legal Dept to find out what the status is before going to Council for approval. That's only if it <br />gets approved tonight. If this Commission elects not to and to wait until there is an Agreement <br />that could be as well.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.