My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06/04/2018 Meeting Minutes
DOcument-Host
>
Mayfield Village
>
Meeting Minutes
>
2018
>
06/04/2018 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2019 11:00:15 AM
Creation date
3/22/2019 6:31:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Legislation-Meeting Minutes
Document Type
Meeting Minutes
Date
6/4/2018
Year
2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Minutes of the Special Meeting of Couiicil <br />Monday, June 4; 2018 <br />Page. 13` <br />homes. It fits there on SOM Center. This is residential 1-2 story homes on Highland and <br />it justdoes not fit: <br />Council President Saponaro stated, thank you: Anyone else? <br />There were no further audience comments. <br />Council President Saponaro stated, we appreciate everyone providing their input. <br />QUESTIONS/COMMENTS BY COUNCILBOARDS/ . <br />COMMISSIONS <br />Mrs. Mills asked, Mr. Skoda, please address your plan for a retention basin for your <br />drainage? <br />1VIr. Skoda replied, I think what we are going to end up having to do will probably help <br />the situation more than hurt it. We are going to be required to have retention on our <br />property. Right now, eyerything that you have coming from all of the properties on the <br />freeway down to the end of the church driveway. We are going to intercept a lot of that <br />with a drainage system on our own property that will be developed througli our engineers <br />and the city engineers and all of the calculations will be done by them so it's not <br />something that's going to be taken lightly. I. actually think it will help solve the water . <br />issue. _ <br />Council President Saponaro asked, does anyone else have any comrrients or questioris? <br />Dr: Parker asked, xf the Law Director can. just clarify or maybe make it clear for the <br />record that if we do not pass this, what would be the options; which we know, but I want <br />it clear, what would be the options for the deveToper at that point? The sec.ond thing <br />mentioned.is we need to be clear because we are trying to show no.bias obviously which <br />sometimes hap.pens with these types of votes. If we were. to decide to yote and put this <br />on the ballot, it's often looked at as an affinnation by the community and obviously that's <br />not the case. It's not about whether we approve of it or`not. It's up to the Villagers to <br />approve of it. But I think we have to be cognizant of tliat and maybe make sure that all of <br />our Villagers are represented and thai it's well undeistood that if this were to be approved - <br />by the Couneil that it's cleaxly not an affirmation or rejection by Council because it's <br />often considered an affirmation when Council puts something on the ballot. I just wanted <br />to be clear for that purpose. <br />Mr. Coyne stated, on the first poiiit; as it relates to your question concerning what else <br />could be done witli the property if the zoning isn't changed. Again, I am. not an engineer <br />and I didn't lay out an additional site plan, but it could be developed for 12-13 single <br />family residences.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.