06/04/2018 Meeting Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Minutes of the Special Meeting of Couiicil Monday, June 4; 2018 Page. 13` homes. It fits there on SOM Center. This is residential 1-2 story homes on Highland and it justdoes not fit: Council President Saponaro stated, thank you: Anyone else? There were no further audience comments. Council President Saponaro stated, we appreciate everyone providing their input. QUESTIONS/COMMENTS BY COUNCILBOARDS/ . COMMISSIONS Mrs. Mills asked, Mr. Skoda, please address your plan for a retention basin for your drainage? 1VIr. Skoda replied, I think what we are going to end up having to do will probably help the situation more than hurt it. We are going to be required to have retention on our property. Right now, eyerything that you have coming from all of the properties on the freeway down to the end of the church driveway. We are going to intercept a lot of that with a drainage system on our own property that will be developed througli our engineers and the city engineers and all of the calculations will be done by them so it's not something that's going to be taken lightly. I. actually think it will help solve the water . issue. _ Council President Saponaro asked, does anyone else have any comrrients or questioris? Dr: Parker asked, xf the Law Director can. just clarify or maybe make it clear for the record that if we do not pass this, what would be the options; which we know, but I want it clear, what would be the options for the deveToper at that point? The sec.ond thing mentioned.is we need to be clear because we are trying to show no.bias obviously which sometimes hap.pens with these types of votes. If we were. to decide to yote and put this on the ballot, it's often looked at as an affinnation by the community and obviously that's not the case. It's not about whether we approve of it or`not. It's up to the Villagers to approve of it. But I think we have to be cognizant of tliat and maybe make sure that all of our Villagers are represented and thai it's well undeistood that if this were to be approved - by the Couneil that it's cleaxly not an affirmation or rejection by Council because it's often considered an affirmation when Council puts something on the ballot. I just wanted to be clear for that purpose. Mr. Coyne stated, on the first poiiit; as it relates to your question concerning what else could be done witli the property if the zoning isn't changed. Again, I am. not an engineer and I didn't lay out an additional site plan, but it could be developed for 12-13 single family residences.