Laserfiche WebLink
Minutes of the Special Meeting of Council <br />Monday, June 4, 2018 <br />Page 14 <br />Dr. Parker stated, that wasn't my question. My question was what would be the process <br />for the developer? <br />Mr. Coyne stated, I'm sorry. So if the developer wanted to, the developer could still take <br />out petitions and have it put on.the ballot through that process. As I understand it, the <br />developer actually was looking to do that. I think the developer actually may have had a <br />number of signatures but it was concluded to go this route because there was more time <br />and that's currently what the developer's requested. So he is going through. this <br />admiiustrative process to put it on the ballot. <br />I also just wanted to note for the record, you are absolutely right. When Council rnakes <br />its decision to put it on the ballot, it's just to put it on the ballot. Council's not endorsing <br />it. They are not opposing it. Individual Councilpeople after that can take positions if <br />tliey chose to as can anybody, else in the community but it's just the process to put it on <br />the ballot, let the voters make the decision whether or not this planned residential <br />development district is consistent with the Village's current plari. <br />Council President Saponaro asked, does anyone else have any questions? Why don't you <br />come to the podium if you have another question? <br />Derrick McDowell <br />6543 Highland Road My main question is, what is the purpose of this then if you guys are going to just rubber <br />stamp this through? Council President Saponaro replied, first of all, it's a miscliaracterization of what we do. <br />When you say something's rubber stamped, I take exception; to that because we don't <br />rubber stamp anything. What we do is we try to allow the people of this Village to vote. <br />It's not up to us. I, would imagine that you, like anyone else, would want to be able to <br />vote whether you want something or you don't want sometl7ing. If it's perceived that we <br />don't allow it to go to the voters, it can be perceived as us. taking away your ability to <br />vote for that. It doesn't stop the developer from also bringing it to the ballot from a <br />different mechanism. So it's a patli of least resistance, but at the end of the day, you all <br />get to vote and majority rules here. So if everyone says, you know what, we don't want <br />it, and if it's voted down, it's vo.fed down. It's not a rubber stamp here. Tt's not an <br />endorsement. <br />Mr. McDowell asked, who are you here to. represent? Are you here to represent the <br />developer? Are you here to represent the_Village? <br />Council President Saponaro replied, we are elected officials for the residents. You are <br />one.resident who does not want it: T11ere's people here tliat say they do want it. How <br />are we supposed to know based on just this conversation? We don't. So that's why a <br />Council sliould never endorse or r,ot endoi-se somethiiig lilce this. We should put it to you <br />all to inake that decision. We happen to be one of you all, but not in this body. As Mr.