Laserfiche WebLink
Minutes of tlle Regular Meeting, of Counci.l <br />Monday, June 18; 2018 <br />Page 12. <br />Larry Piecuch <br />6450 Highland Road <br />I live completely adjacent to this new project.. I would like to not object to it. In fact if you ride . <br />on Highland Road right now, there's brokeri trees and until recently I had to call every two <br />weeks to have the lawn cut over there and it was never maintained. It was just a mess. . Nobody <br />else on Highland Road called to have it cut but Larry haci to call. So I think this is a good thing. <br />We're tired of looking at tfiat field, fwo fields with broken trees. You go down there today arid <br />see all the broken trees. I didn't come up here to 'speak today but I feel I have to speak for this <br />project. I think it should be put on the ballot. Do you have any questions for me? <br />Council President Saponaro stated, no, but we appreciate your coming up. <br />IVIr. Piecuch stated, I also own right next to this project so I won't object to it and these people <br />that are.objecting to it are not even near this property so I don't even know why they object to it. <br />We.have no problem getting out of our driveway during rush hour and no problem witli flooding <br />either so I don't know where the flooding is. It's not by.us. We've lived tliere for 30 years. <br />Council Pres'ident Saponaro stated; thank you, Mr. Piecuch. We appreciate it. <br />Derek McDowell 6543 Highland Road <br />I just wanted . to talk specifically in regards to what Mr. Skoda said about building current <br />, residential development there. And specifically intent for this ordinance, Section (B) it says; <br />offer cluster and townl-iouse development as a transitional use along and in locations which <br />should be made residential which it qualifies that this should remain residential but are not or <br />may not be suitable for standard residential subdivisions: So in terms of that, to his own <br />statements, .he can put 12-15 houses in there now, so right tllere, it kind of just negates the intent <br />of this section. So I just wanted to add that in there and to say to his own submission he said he <br />could put a development. in there and. I think Law Director Coyne said the same thing in tlie last <br />public Caucus. . . ' Council President Saponaro stated, absolutely. <br />Mr. McDowell stated, and another section oii inteiit (D) on preserving existing :landscape <br />features, areas in llarmonious fashion. I think that's wliy we talked about it fit so inuch. Aiid <br />then Section (E) ensure developinents aie compatible with surrounding areas. So the intent for <br />the ordinance is very specific that fit in matters of when you talk about does it satisfy the <br />requiremeiits of the intent, I think it's important to not discard the fit that we the local residents <br />are talking about. <br />Council President Saponaro stated, that's why we have Planning and Zoning who looks at tllat <br />and then makes a recoinmendation which they did. They did do that initially. .