06/18/2018 Meeting Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Minutes of the Regular. Meetiiig of Council Monday, June 18, 2018 Page 17 OLD,SUSINESS-;: ; • Third Readiniz of O.rdinance No. 2018-17; entitled, "An Ordinance revising the zone map of Nlayfield Village so as to amend the use classifcation of 6.93 acres of land arid known as Permaiient Parcel Numbers 831-10-019, 831=10-007 and 831-10-006 from its current classification of U-1 single family residential district to planned residential . development district." Introduced by Mayor Bodnar and Council as a Whole. (Law Department) (Eirst Reading- 3-19-18; Second Reading 4-16-18) Mrs. Mills, seconded by Mr. Williains, made a motion to enact Ordinance No. 2018-17. Council President Saponaro asked; discussion? As we alluded to earlier, I would like to hear 'from Department Heads that have concerns regarding the reclassification of this property. We cari start with Mr. Cappello with flooding and water being tlie big issue: Mr. 1Vletzung, I know that you deal with that as well so you are certainly welcome to chime in and are encouraged to. Mr: Cappello stated, regarding flooding, at this point we are just putting in for rezoning. If this was a single-family residential. or planned development, they have to meet the Code. There's a stormwater management. code which requires the developer to provide. stormwater detention: It's actually a very strict ordinance. . You are limited to the one-year pre-developed storin discharge for. wliat they call a critical storm. In this case.; it is factored froTri a grass area lawn to a multi-family home. It would be a higher standard so there will actually be a less discharge amount which would be less than what.it currently is: . The amount of water would increase obviously from the fact that it's an.impervious area, but they have.to meet that requirement. If there's any ripariari setbacks which I arri not sure there is based on the maps we have, but wetlands, those things have to be addressed during the development part, the.design part, and we would have to review those also and they would. have to. design around those if they were in fact there. The ordinances are set. up to, again, . address those issues at the time of deveiopment no matter what the development is. If it's. residential single-family, multi-family or commercial/iridustrial. Council President Saponaro asked, the _fact that there's going to be potentially 26 or at least 12, what's. your concern from a water and flooding standpoint? Mr. Cappello repTied; again, they liave to ineet their criteria af Code. wliich is fairly. strict. Again; it will all be looked at at the time the development comes . in. Once we get all the data, we can look at it and see. what ends up happening after pre/post type situations. At : this point I am riot concerned. I have to see what happens. Again, if they come iri with a single=family residential, we have to be coneerned.also that they would be addressing it with the detention requirenrent: Oiie other thing about -populafion, I think the one thing, this is roughly. 6 acres. I think SOM Court was around the same size. Tlie last time I heard there were about 50 residents, roughly two per uiiit on average. We are roughly 3500. To get to city status would be 1500 more residents which would require a significant amount of acreage which I doi1't see iiecessarily. I am not saying that can never 1lappen Uut I don't