Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioners. Prior to this date, there had been no organized system of 9-1-1 <br />anywhere in the county. This document was prepared pursuant to the requirements <br />specified in the Ohio Revised Code (ORC). It provided the County's Board of County <br />Commissioners, municipal corporations and boards of township trustees with written <br />description of the proposed Countywide 9-1-1 System, the proposed Public Safety <br />Answering Point (PSAP) territories, the location of the PSAPs, the System's features and <br />operations, and the initial and recurring costs. The Ohio Bell Telephone Company <br />estimated that the 9-1-1 System could be implemented county -wide 14-18 months after <br />the plan was approved making it feasible that 9-1-1 services would be available to <br />individuals in the County during the last quarter of 1987. <br />A one-time cost of installing the 9-1-1 Network and establishing the Data Management <br />System's database was estimated to be $3,650,218. The State of Ohio paid these costs <br />via a tax credit to Ohio Bell. The estimated annual cost of maintaining the 9-1-1 Network <br />and Data Management System's database was $938,856. All telephone subscribers in <br />the county would equally contribute to this ongoing monthly cost at a rate of 12 cents per <br />line. <br />Costs for each Public Safety Answering Point (PSAP) were primarily related to the <br />equipment installed and maintained at the Primary, Secondary and Default PSAPs. It <br />was determined the cost savings derived from leasing equipment from Ohio Bell as <br />opposed to purchasing and maintaining equipment from another vendor was significant. <br />Initial one-time installation fees were estimated to be $1,256,673 and monthly lease and <br />maintenance fees totaled approximately $59,713. These costs included all Primary, <br />Default and Secondary PSAPs and included the following functions and services: <br />selective routing, default routing, automatic number identification (ANI), call transfer, call <br />hold, call return, forced disconnect, alternate routing, automatic location identification <br />(ALI), hard copy with and without address. This plan was adopted and executed on March <br />24, 1986. Cuyahoga County's 9-1-1 system went live in November 1987. <br />As cell phone service proliferated during the early 1990s, CECOMS became the Primary <br />Safety Answering Point for all wireless 9-1-1 calls made in the County. CECOMS staff <br />would establish the location of the caller and then route the call to the appropriate PSAP <br />for dispatch. <br />In addition, CECOMS became a regional information gathering and deciphering point for <br />AMBER Alerts, mutual aid coordination, severe weather alerts and telephone support for <br />county PSAPs. <br />In 2012, Cuyahoga County contracted with Attevo to complete a detailed assessment of <br />the 48 PSAPs that existed at that time. The purpose of the study was to determine where <br />overlaps between PSAPs existed and to develop a plan for efficiencies including PSAP <br />consolidations. Overall, the study concluded that Cuyahoga County should work to <br />significantly reduce the number of PSAPs countywide. Cuyahoga County made the <br />reduction of PSAPs a priority while furthering the County's mission for regional <br />collaboration in 2011. <br />In order to support these collaborations, Cuyahoga County invested over 15 million <br />dollars to provide state of the art Next Generation 9-1-1 (NG9-1-1) equipment with built- <br />in redundancies such as dual connections to both the Cleveland and Columbus host. <br />16 <br />