|
I . , i ' • . , _ - ,
<br />MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETIN6
<br />Village of Mayfield
<br />November 20, 1972 ;- ,
<br />. , .
<br />• The Council of the, Village of Mayfield met in regular, session at May-
<br />" field Village Hall on November 20 at 8:05 p.m. Mayor Beebe,gresided.
<br />' , - - . . • , `a.. - ? : , The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag was given. • Roll Call t Present s Mayor. Beebe, Messrs* Boger, Bosdonaro,
<br />-, - , Braun, Davis, Leech,.& Schmidt:
<br />' Absent: None ' , .
<br />Also present were Messrs. Rel,ic, Edelman, Hovancsek,.D'Agostino, -
<br />Chiefs He j cl and Shortle.
<br />Comments from the floor: Arthur Miniello, 6198 Wil.son Mills Road, presented a notorized letter =..
<br />on a request for rezoning of his property from residential to cammer-cial use. All Committees have a copy of previous request.for study. ? I -Mr. Edelman adviseci-at this point an Ordinance could be introduced •
<br />by a Councilman and a$35.00 fee paid to the C1.erk-Treasurer's office : for processing along with a legal description. Ordinance will be
<br />drafted for next meeting.
<br />Charles Prior, 6205 S. Woodlane, suggested.. the OrdinanCe on parking of .-
<br />" recreational vehicles be separated into categories. Has no objections
<br />?to boats parked in driveways, but does object to undesirables like '.
<br />.. junk cars, pickup trucks, etc. Ordinance Review Committee to further. study as directed by the Mayor. Mr. Edelman stated other municipal-
<br />.- ities have the same problem.
<br />Ruth Gillis, 6180 Wilson Mills Road, asked for a Councilmanic investi-
<br />. gation on the Recreation Park bond issue because of all the "skum" that
<br />was brought up in petty politics. The Mayor suggested Mrs. Gillis sub-?.-:.:mit her request in writing to Council, then a meeting would be arranged.
<br />Charles Shiffer, Novelty,Ohio, the Village's rubbish collector pre- „..
<br />sented his problem of increased volume of leaves during October and more so in Nrnrember. Landfill costs a].one for October was $230. Mr. ; -
<br />Bordonaro asked if the cost was attributed just to the leaves because, of the no open burning law to which Mr. Shiffer replied yes; his "3ncome had not increased to comp.ensate for the additional load of .;.
<br />leaves. Mr. Relic asked Mr'. Shiffer for a total cost breakdown for
<br />the month of October. . Mr.. Edelman said the contract does provide for ?;.:,
<br />ick of leaves : and Mr. Shiff?ac is legallY,bound bY that contract p up .; , ;? ,
<br />'.? . although, a. moral claim could,-be entered. . Mre Shiffer, c.tted in.Worton .:
|