02/10/1987 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

? PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 10, 1987 PAGE 4 reasons for denial that a lot would be created that, outside of the access easement,.would.not have frontage as required by code, seconded by R. Bierman, and unanimously approved. V. COMMUNICATIONS: A copy of Mr. Wixted's resignation dated February lst was read. VI. COMMITTEE REPORTS: No items. VII. NEW BUSINESS: No items.. VIII. OLD BUSINESS: 1) Review of Kenny King fencing and speaker as required by Planning Commission on January 27; 1987. .. . 4 b ' .y . ? At the last meeting the Building Department.submitted a report whicli stated that the fencing on the south east side of the Kenny King pro- perty was not shielding automobile lights as had been stipulated in the approval on December 9, 1986. Mr. Salisbury, attorney for Kenny King, advised that he and Mr. Campbell, president of the corporation, had been on the Schmitz property and viewed the situation. He explained that the fence had originally been a board on board fence, but since this had not been satisfactory, they had.added boards on one side of the fence (between the trash enclos ure to the rear of the adjacent Ha7.leen b uilding) to make a solid fence on one side. Since this is still allowing Iight-to come through, they are now proposing that they will add boards on the other side of the fence so that the fence will be solid on both sYdes, clarifying that they will stagger the boards, ',a.'rranging'them over the gaps. Mr. Bierman questioned what they had done about the speakers, since neighbors can hear the Kenny King people taking orders. Mr. Salisb.ury advised that they speaker has been ':turned down to the lowest volume possible. He explained that the speaker and microphone are mounted on a post, and the speaker itself has been tumed within the post, thus being directed into the car. In case this does not work, Councilman Tallon, questioned if it would be possible to turn the post so that the speaker:is directed toward the earth mound. Mr. Salisb ury believes this could cause prob lems. Mr. Gorris is concerned that the fence might not be stable, suggesting that boards could be staggered in such a way as to permit air to circulate. Proposal was explained to Mr. and Mrs. Schmitz, Mrs. Beck and Mrs: Mahoney, neighbors; who still tiave concerns: Mrs. Schmitz: reminded the Commission that originally there were..to be two fences, one on the Halleen property line and one on the Kenny King line. Councilman Tallong aTso questioned the Halleen fence since it was removed during the construction of Kenny Kings. Mr. Salisbury is not sure what happened to the Halleen fence, does not believe that this was the portion of the fence that they re- moved, but stated that the fence on the retaining wall did belong to