My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02/24/1987 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
1987
>
1987 Planning Commission
>
02/24/1987 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:30:52 PM
Creation date
1/29/2019 3:17:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
1987
Board Name
Planning Commission
Document Name
Minutes
Date
2/24/1987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 24, 1987 PAGE 5 <br />2) Milton's Rezoning Proposal <br />Proposal is to rezone permanent parcel number 232-28-25 from "B" <br />Residence District to General Business Retail Zoning in conjunction <br />with the plans as submitted. The parcel is located north of Milton's <br />Restaurant on the eastern side of Silverdale Road. The parcel to be <br />rezoned contains approximately 0.23 acres of land. <br />City Engineer Schaller presented proposal to rezone, explaining that <br />the zoning line at this point is not even and the adjacent Property <br />facing Lorain Road is zoned General Retail further b ack than the <br />Milton's property. He also pointed out that the restaurant property <br />is actually two lots. Mr. Swietyniowski, representing Milton's, ex- <br />plained that the lot in question is a legally nonconforming parcel <br />and is vacant. Tf the property is rezoned.they intend to buffer it <br />along the residential property with landscaping, trees (approximately <br />30 to 35); a fence (type to be determined by the adjacent residents); <br />and will continue this buffer along the Silverdale Avenue frontage, <br />if residents so desire. There will be no access on Silverdale, and <br />parking lot will be illuminated with low ground lights. The.owner <br />is willing to place deed restrictions on this lot so that it would <br />have to be maintained as a parking lot and with the buffer strip as <br />described. This rezoning would stra'iglit.en the zone line between <br />Canterbury Road and Silverdale Avenue and the depth of the General <br />Retail property would not be greater than the 500 foot maximum which <br />is the usual depth of this zoning along Lorain Road. Assistant Law <br />Director Dubelko agreed that the deed restriction would maintain <br />the property as a parking lot and could also enforce landscaping and <br />lighting restrictions. Mrs. Sappone, who lives behind the adjacent <br />Burger King, complained because their dumpster is next to her yard <br />and is concerned that the Milton's dumpster would also be moved back <br />onto this lot. Mr. Swietyniowski stated that the dumpster could be <br />prohibited on this property by the deed restrictions. Mr. Gorris is <br />concerned because this problem is the result of over developing the <br />property and he is questioning where does this type of rezoning stop, <br />especially since there are other developments in the same situation, <br />and stated that the argument for straightening the zone line could <br />be used in many other instances. Mr. Morgan stated that the Commision <br />has an obligation to develop the city in an orderly fashion, and that <br />residents have a right to believe that adjacent property will not be <br />rezoned. Mr. Swietyniowski responded that each rezoning should be <br />judged individually and is not a precedent setting situation, that the <br />property involved is non-conforming and prob ably will never be developed. <br />Chairman Burns has no problem with this particular proposal since lot <br />is small and non-conforming, and this rezoning will alleviate an exist- <br />ing problem, it will align the zone line between Canterbury Road and <br />Silverdale Avenue, and he does not believe it would create a problem <br />for the residents in the area. J. Burns moved to approve the rezoning <br />request for permanent parcel numb.er 232-28-25 on the condition that <br />the parcel is assembled along with the two existing parcels occupied <br />by Milton's restaurant, seconded by E. Traczyk. Roll call on motion: <br />Burns, Traczyk, and Bierman, Yes. Thomas, Gorris, and Morgan, No. <br />Motion failed to pass. E. Traczyk moved to approve the proposal to <br />rezone permanent parcel number232-28-25 contingent upon the assembly <br />of the three permanent parcels and the deed restrictions without egress
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.