07/28/1987 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

,.u.?.:??.?.1:a.ir:il?lr?w.;.:J?i?..>.?-1?..a...:.?i:.a.a:.?,:?i?...,....._.?..,.......:.,:...?....,.....i.'......?...-_....'.........._..??.? ...... .. ....... .... ?. _...._............>,.........?..... ...?...,...,....n,....?..........,.r...............,......,............ .?. ? ? r CITY OF NORTH OLMSTED PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - JULY 28, 1987 I. ROLL CALL: Chairman Burns called the meeting to order at 8:10 p.m. Present: M. Betts, R. Bierman, B. Gorris, T. Morgan, J. Thomas, E. Traczyk, and J. Burns Also Present: Assistant Law Director J. Dubelko, Building Commissioner D. Conway, City Engineer J. Schaller, and Clerk of Commissions B. Oring Chairman Burns.welcomed David Conway, the Cit.y's new Building Conunissioner. II. REVIEW AND CORRECTION OF MINUTES: M. Betts moved to approve the Planning Commission minutes dated July 14, 1987 as submitted, seconded bq R. Bierman, and unanimously aparoved. III. BUILDING DEPARTMENT REQUESTS: 1) Store-it Here, southside of Lorain Road, west of McKenzie Road Proposal to construct a self service storage building. (Heard by the Architectural Board of Review July 22, 1987). Mr. D. Neff, engineer, presented additional revised floor plans reflecting interior changes as mentioned at the Architectural Review Board hearing as being required by code; the Architectural Board also noted that the proposed ground sign must be relocated to conform to the code. The Police Department report questioned if outdoor storage of vehicles would be permitted in the rear of the property. Mr. ideff replied that there is to be no storage of vehicles outside of the building; vehicles could be stored in the buildings. Building Commissioner Conway advised that xTehicle storage within the building must be considered during the plan review. Mr. Conway stated that, as he interprets the Zoning Codes, this use would not be permitted in the General Retail Business District. Assistant Law Director Dubelko agreed that a storage facility is not specifically mentioned as a. permitted use in the General Retail District and is requesting that the proposal be tabled in order for the Law Department to research the issue completely including researching the approvals previously given to a storage facility that?is all ready exisiting in the General Retail District. Chairman Burns questioned if there was a difference between an owner using such a facility and an owner leasing the property for someone else to use for storage. Mr. Dubelko stated that there is not, and further advised that if it 3:s determined that this is not a permitted use, the owner would have to request a rezoning, he could not seek a variance. Mr. Conway also Yias concerns because the quarters which are to be used for :their personel on a shift.basis could also be used as a residence, and there is no window which opens. onto a yard or a court yard as required by code. Mr. Neff stated that he was.advised