10/13/1987 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

? ?'., . PLANNING COMMISSTON OCTOBER 13, 1987 PAGE 3 owner of the fourth lot. He explained that when Hastings Road was relocated by the State, they sewers were not installed. Cons.ulting City Engineer Boyle advised that the.easement is sufficient, however, he pointed out that the easement is to be placed 30 feet from the property lineand would reduce the buildable area of the lots since a permanent structure could not be bu3.lt over the easement. Mr. Dunlap explained that they were trying to'change two rows of trees and does not believe any variances will be required.because the lots are deen. Mr. James, attorney for Mrs.. Beebe owner of the fourth lot, advised that he had been working with Mr. Dunlap and Mrs. Beebe had no problem with the pro- posal as long as the sewers were extended to her property. Mr. Cooper, a resident of Somerset Drive, was advised that they plan to construct the sewers this year if the weather permits and that the sewers will be attached through Somerset. Ms. Nosselrod, a potential buyer of propert_y on the south side of Hastings Drive, questioned haow she could build a sewer there. Mr: Dunlap stated that they could extend sewers from his, but at present there are only two lots on Hastings which because of their width are unbuildable. Mr.. Boy1e-advised her what steps must be taken to assemble the two lots and to get permission to extend.the sewer. B. Gorris znoved to approve the_.Hastings Drive utility easement for.per- manent parcel numbers 234-22-15, 234-22-16, 234-22-24, and 234-22-25 as presented on the print dated April 17, 1987, seconded by E. Traczylc, and unanimously approved. V. COMMUNICATIONS: No items. VI. COMMITTEE REPORTS: No items. VII. NEW BUSINESS: No items. VIII. OLD BUSINESS: The Commission discussed methods for the study of the areas proposed for possible re=zoning by -Ctiairman . Burns at the last meeting. Mr. Burns e2.mlained that the Law Department has suggested.that anv such discussion be in open forum at regularly scheduled meetings. Tt was agreed that any such study• should be done without pressure from a developer or adjacent residents, who could express their views later at a public hearing. Mr. Gorris believes that there should.be a svecific uronosal for use of the land which is proposed for rezoning.; and is.doubtful the-voters would.anprove a re-zoning to Multi- Famtly without such a proposal. Mr. Betts would like some type of a broad general discussion of the.Zoning Codes prior to discussing the individual narcels. Mr. Gorris would like to call in some kind of consultant, such as Regional Planning Commission, for p'rofessional advice. Chairman Burns read a letter from Fred Pizzadaz from N.O.A.C.A. offering.their assistance. He believes that there should be some rational for either.changing or re-afirming