06/03/1987 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS JUNE 3, 1987 PAGE 4 % they have had problems with people who use this walk, they.do not want to put the pool on that side of the property. R. Goinersall moved to grant Mr. and Mrs. Steele, 4989 Lansing Dr, a 2 foot side yard variance for a swimming pool, seconded by J. Helon, and unanimously approved. Variance granted. 9. Sandra L. Hardy, 3271 West 231 St. Request for variance (:1133.13). Request l.foot height variance and variance for solid fence on corner lot (not 90% open). Violation of Ord. 62-33, Section 1151.04=H. Chairman Remmel called all interested parties before the Board. The oath was administered to Mr. Bowersox, the neighbor to the north, and Miss Hardy who explained that her southernproperty line-is 16 feet away from the condominium sidewalk and drive and that She need's asolid, six foot fence. .. for privacy. She stated that there are approximately 100 to 150 cars in and out of the driveway each day. Mr. Bowersox objects to any fence on his side of:the propertg (north), b ut agrees.that she needs it on the south. He maintains that the bushes and trees create a natural barrier at the rear. Miss Hardy presented pictures showing.that the dumpster is immediately • behind her property and that propos,ed fence would be 16 feet away from roadway and would not cause visibiTity problems. Mr. Remmel pointed out the property is heavily wooded and dumpster is screened by this natural screening, and that most corner lots are exposed to traffic. R.. Bugala moved t.o grant the l foot height va.riance and a variance for a solid fence on a corner lot for Sandra L. Hardy, 3271 West 231 St., seconded by G: Remmel. Roll call on motion: Bugala, Remmel, Gomersall, and.Helon, no. Motion failed to pass. Variance denied. Tt was explained to Miss Hardy that she could have a split rail or chain link fence on the corner side of the property and a S foot solid fence can be installed on the rear and north side of her lot without a variance. Mr. Sanker stated that she was en- titled to .16 feet o£ a 6 foot privacy screen behind the house, if it is pla.ced 5 feet off the property 1ine, She was further advised that she can appeal this decision through the Common Pleas Court. 10. Franklin D. Lester, 5444 Porter Rd. Reques.t special permit to add to non-conforming dwelling (front and rear set backs). Special permission required Ord. 62-33, Section 1231.02. Chairman Remmel called all interested parties before the Board. The oath was administered to Mr. and Mrs. Lester who explained that they were only enclosing.the area where the porch is riow. C. -Remmel moved to grant the special permit to add to a non-conforming dwelling to conform to the Build- ing Department requirements, se'conded by R. Bugala, and unanimously approved. Special permit granted. 11. Mary Karcher, 3666 Clague Rd. Request for variance (1133.13). Request 1 foot height variance for fence. Violation of Ord. 62-33, Section 1151.04-H. Chairman Remmel called all interested parties before the Board. The oath was administered t.o Mrs. Karcher who explained that Waldo's Nursery has.a 7 foot fence on the rear property line, and one siiie of her property is adjacent to the church parking lot. Mr. Bugala has no problem with the