My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/07/1987 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
1987
>
1987 Board of Zoning Appeals
>
01/07/1987 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:31:04 PM
Creation date
1/29/2019 3:45:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
1987
Board Name
Board of Zoning Appeals
Document Name
Minutes
Date
1/7/1987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
. <br />A <br />BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS JANUARY 7, 1987 PAGE 3 <br />who explained that he is requesting an interpretation of Section I221.04-A1 <br />which states "The area of the faces visible from a public way of all per- <br />manent exterior signs,..." He is contending that the south elevation of <br />the building is not visible from a public way since it faces the strip shop- <br />ping center and should not be included in the total sign area. He is not <br />asking for a variance, merely how to figure the sign area allowed in this <br />particular case. He pointed out that the signs inside the mall (not visible <br />from a public way) do not have to meet the frontage requirement of the code. <br />He also wants clarification that he can place signs on all four side of the <br />building. Building Commissioner Spino produced a letter from Assistant Law <br />Director Dubelko which states in part "'.m.signage in a general retail business <br />distriet is essentially determined by the amount of building frontage. The <br />building in q.uestion apnears to have two store fronts..." Mr. Carlisle was <br />not advised of this determination. Board has no problem with placing signs <br />on all four sides of the building, but believes that signage on the south <br />side should conform to sign area requirements. B. Grace moved that the <br />Board rules that the signs on the strand side of the building (which is the <br />south side of the b uilding) is considered to be part of the total signage <br />area as as allowed by the current codes that are not. in effect and this <br />ruling pertains only to this particular case, seconded.by C. Remmel, and <br />unanimously approved. <br />B. Grace moved that the Board agrees that ttie Browns are going to win on <br />Sunday, seeonded by R. Gomersall. Roll eall on motion Grace, Gomersall, <br />Bugala, and Remmel, Yes. Mr. Helon, No. Motion passed. <br />The meeting was adjourned at 9:05 p.m. <br />C. Remmel, Chairman B. Oring, Cr1,6rk of Commissions
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.