09/02/1987 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. ? BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS SEPTEMBER 2, 1987 PAGE 5 11. Shirley Gluyas, 24102 Beech Lane. Request for variance (I133.13). Req.uest 51 foot variance for privacy screen and location of.nrivacv screen on two points only on property lines. Violation of Ord. 62-33, Section 1151.04-G. Chairman Remmel called all interested parties before the Board. The oath was administered to Mr. Gluyas and her son, J. Gluyas, who explained she needed a 6 foot privacy screen across the front of her property in order to screen car lights from the front of her house (house is located on a cul-de-sac and faces the street) and for security reasons. They do not believe that a five foot fence would be architecturally attractive and it would not obscure the service entrance. They are willing to use a five foot fence on the south side of the property and on the section across the driveway (this would eliminate the location variance for a privacy screen), thus the request be for 39 feet of 6 foot privacy screen. Considering that reduction, Mr. Grace does not believe that they are asking too much. Mr. Remmel stated that even though much of the proposed screening is obscur,ed by trees, another owner could take the trees out and the screen would be visible. Mr. Bugala believes that the five foot high fence would be adequate. B. Grace moved to approve the request for a 39 foot variance for a privacy screen for Shirley Gluyas, 24102 Beech Lane, seconded by R. Gomersall. Roll call on motion: Grace and Remmel, yes. Bugala, Gomersall, and Helon, no. Motion failed to nass. Variance denied. 17. Kenneth Schroder, 23514 Stoneybrook Dr. (Heard at this point) Request for variance (1133.13). Request 7 foot rear yard variance for deck with roof.. Violati,on of Oxd, 62-.33, Sectzon 1163,01, Chairman Remmel called all interested pax'ties before the Board. The oath was administered to Mr. Schroder, Members had no objection to the request. C. Remmel moved to grant the variance, seconded by B. Grace, and unanimously approved. Variance granted. 12. Mr, and Mrs. Alan Srp, 23582 Cedarwood Lane Req_uest for variance (.1133.13). Request 8 foot 6 inch rear yard variance for patio enclosure. Violation of Ord. 62- 33, Section 1163.01. Chairman Remmel called all interested parties before the Board. The oath was administered to Mr. Srp and a representative of Patio Enclosures. Board has viewed the premises and has no objection to the request. R. Bugala moved to grant the variance, seconded by J. Helon, and unanimously approved. 13. RoseMarie and Edward Doehring, 27880 North Park Dr. Request for variance (1133.13). Req_uest 1 foot height variance for fence (dog run), Violation of Ord. 62-33, Section 1151.04-H, Chairman Remmel called all interested narties before the Board. The oath was administered to Mr. Rychlik, a neighbor, Mr, Doehring, and Mr. Damm, who resides in the.house. r1r. Damm exolained that the dog run would be nlaced directly behind the garage. Mr. Rych lik has no objection.but would like the fence screened on his side so the dogs do not bark at his family. Mr. Damm and Mro Doehring claim that th.eir trees and Mr. Rychlik's trees will screen the