01/26/1988 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

PLANNING COMMISSION JANUARY 26, 1988 PAGE 4 1 4) Livingston's (formerly Eddie's), Great Northern Shopping Center Proposal to alter entrance in rear of Great Northern Plaza Heard by Architectural Board of Review January 20, 1988. Mr. Montgomery, owner, and Mr. Dixon, architect, presented revised plans for facade on rear wall of plaza, explaining that plans have been upgraded at the request of the owner; pitch was changed on roof line and columns were added to be more in keeping with Plaza South. Commission prefered the revised plan. Mr. Piontgomery explained that the script letters •of ?tlie sign might be changed. Mr. Gorris stated that he still does not want the awning to be lighted claiming that if light is allowed to glow through the canopy, it would basicall_y be a sign; he has no probelm with the down lighting. There will also be up lighting in the planting beds. Mr. Dixon presented samples of the Pratt and Lambert paints which are to be used. After studying photographs of the existing site, the Commission agreed that a raised sidewalk should be installed in one of the parking spaces for a drop off area; that because of potential security problems behind the stage front, they suggested that some type of gate or security lighting be provided, pointing out that one side could be sealed off completely, but access must be available to meters on other side; and suggested that.the entire wall to the arcade area should be painted, and the painting should not be stopped at the end of this unit as shown on the nlan. B. Gorris moved to approve the Livingston's proposal, Great Northern Plaza, including the recommendations of the Architectural Board of Review and with the condition that a raised sidewalk be installed coming out from.the end of the canopy.and should be at least the width and depth:of one narking space; that the proposed canopy can have down- _ lighting, but cannot be translucent, nor can light glow through that canopy; that the colors be as shown: Pratt and Lambert Peanut Shell on the facade and painted walls, Brown Sugar on the insterts,Bronze Gold as an accent color and on columns, and Emerald Green on metal copiiig and with a dark green awning and with the recommendations that the painting of the existing building be continued west to the arcade area; and that some type of security lighting should be installed behind the false walls on both sides, seconded by M. Betts. Roll call on motion: Gorris, Betts, Bierman, Thomas, and Morgan, yes. Mrs. Traczyk abstained. IV. NEW DEVELOPMENTS AND SUBDIVISIONS: 1) Arthur A. Al1}i Resubdivisiori No. 3 The prouosal is to split permanent parcel no. 237-19-23 into two (2) sublots, one of which front'on Brookpark Road and the other on Mastick Road, and each sublot having the I-480 right-of-way as the rear property . line. Zoning is "A" Residence, Single for sublot 1-A, and Multiple Residence (frontage) and "A" Residence, Single (rear) for sublot 2-A: Both proposed sublots conform to the.Zoning Code in-frontage and area. Consulting City Engineer Boyer explained that.parcel. ].,'facing Mastick Road, is zoned Single Family "A", and parcel 2, facing Brooknark Road, presently has two zoning classifica;tions, the front portion approximately 430 feet from the centerline is Multi-Family, and anproximately 350 feet of the rear portion is zoned Single Family. He advised that both of the adjoiniug lots oii Brookpark have split zoning.: Thi.s lot presently has one parcel number but is split by I-480. The lot:on Mastick Road,