02/09/1988 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. ? ? PLANNING COPiMISSION ' FEBRUARY 9, 1988 PAGE 2 It was agreed_by Mr. King,.Mr. Valarian, attorney for Hyde Park, and Mr. Dubelko that Planning Commission could give a conditional approval based on such an agreement being reached prior to final approval. Mr. Thomas questioned xahy the property line could not be moved so that the entire cul-de-sac would be on Phase II propert_y, since the pronerty is to be snlit into two parcels. Developers will consider this. A letter had been recieved from John Knox Church Board of Trustees withdrawing their request for a fence on their common property line and stating that the planned landscaping would be sufficient. Since there are several land- scape plans as well as other site plans which were reviewed, Mr. Gorris initialed and dated one complete set of.plans to be fozwarded to the BZD Committee. The Safety Department report stated they had no objection to proposal; Fire Department advised that water for fire protection must be provided. Mr. Valarian,.attorney for Hyde Park, advised that the association i.s in the process of reaching agreements on various issues, including that of the cul-de-sac, with the developers. B. Gorris moved to approve Columbia Village Apartments Phase III, located to rear.of lots on north side of Lorain Road between Columbia and Root Roads conditioned upon the following: 1) an.easement arrangement.between the Phase II and Phase TiI property owners acceptable to the Law.Department as it relates to the proposed cul-de-sac or 2) as an acceptable alternative to the first condition could be the deeding of the area in which the cul-de-sac falls, to the owners of Phase II; 3) that the cul-de-sac be completed and paved by the end of April 1988; 4) that all the screening as approved by the Architectural Review Board is incorporated in this develonment, that includes-.the screening along the west property line by John Knox-in lei.u of.the fence as had tieen previously recommended; 5) that all drawings relating to the parcel are so noted wtth.the words "Planning.Commission February 9, 1988, B.G." so there are no questions as to which drawings have been reviewed, seconded by M. Betts, and unanimously approved. 2) Romp's Dairy Queen & Brazier, 24579 Lorain Road Revision to exterior of building from that originally approved by Planning Commission December 9, 1986. B..Slattery, contractor, and T. Romp, owner, presented revised plans which now show the twenty feet of brick in the center of the solarium front. The originally approved plans had the entire addition in glass. Mr. Romp explained that they needed this solid area for their freezers. Mr. Conway advised that the construction is completed and that a variance was granted for the wall sign.which is on the front brick;.an.d construction does - conform to code. Mr. Dubelko questioned if the variance that was granted originally for the encroachment in the front addressed in any way the glass. The variance bnly addressed the encroachment in the.set back and the Board of Zoning Appeals was aware of the.b rick front when they granted , the variance for the sign. The Commission discussed if proposal should- be referred to the.Architectural Board of Review. Mr. Pattison, a member of the board, was in the audience and stated .that the change was insigni- ficant and did not believe that further review would be.necessary. M. Betts moved to approve rhe revision to the.exterior of the building.for Romp's Dairy Oueen and Brazier at.24579 Lorain Road as submitted; seconded by B. Gorris, and unanimously approved.