Laserfiche WebLink
- -? __V <br />PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 13, 1988 PAGE 6 <br />of the first building and landscaping will be completed with the construction <br />of the second and third building, adjacent residents may chose the type of <br />ornamental trees they wanto Mr. Carlisle presented graphs showing the impact <br />of a 4 story office building set back 100 feet with landscaped buffer, and of <br />homes set back 50 feet with no required buffering; graphs depicting the density <br />of one, two, and four story buildings and the amount of open area for each, <br />the taller the building, the more open area. He maintains that this office <br />project will create 2,125 jobs and according to their figures from other <br />developments, 350 of these jobs would beheld by North Olmsted residents. They <br />project that from 1991 to 1995 a residential development would require $857,000 <br />to support it, however the office__building would create a surplus of 1.3 mil- <br />lion dollars for the community._ In summery Mr. Carlisle stated that they <br />have developed this proposal with the input of the neighbors, will continue <br />to work with both the neighbors and the Planning Commission and will accept <br />the requirements of the Office Building District as legislated. Adjacent <br />property owners addressed the Commission. D. Brisler, vice president of the <br />Park West Home Owners Association, requested that rezoning be tabled until <br />Ord. 88-75 is clarified. A. Koson prefers office use to multi-family. Council- <br />man McKay agrees that rezoning should be postponed until the ordinance is <br />specific and questioned if it is proper to rezone properties on Columbia Road <br />since if they are rezoned no buffering would be required. Assistant Law <br />Director Dubelko stated that there are yard requirements between building and <br />parking areas and non-residential property, but they are not as strict and <br />would not require the same type of buffering. M. Zimmerman, a resident, <br />questioned if the City is profiting from Biskind's developments, pointing <br />out the condition of roads, taxes which have not been reduced, and schools <br />which are asking for additional monies. Mrs. Diver questioned if the ordi- <br />nance could not be written so as to require taller buildings to be placed <br />closer to Brookpark Road and the Corporate Center thus keeping the lower <br />buildings closer to residential areas, both single family and multi-family, <br />and requested that the Commission consider 180 to 200 foot set back if the <br />250 foot set back is unacceptable to developers; she presented pictures of <br />the Corporate Center buildings taken from 100, 150? 200, 250, and 300 feet <br />away illustrating the impact of these buildings from their backyards. Council <br />man McKay stated that the traffic figures as presented would seem to be <br />favorable, but pointed out that the rush hour traf.fic would be increased, and <br />believes that many of these cars will be using residential streets. Mr. Jaco, <br />another neighbor, stated that these same arguments were used with previous <br />rezoning requests and is not convinced that these office buildings are needed <br />by the City and pointed out the developer knew how the property was zoned <br />when he purchased it. Other neighbors.a Mr. DiRoma, Mrs. Christler, Mrs. <br />Schuller stated various concerns: noise, lack of privacy, excess traffic, and <br />questioned the accuracy of the projected traffic counts. Mr. Carlisle responded <br />that their figures could be off by several percent but were based on both <br />developments being completed; development will not intrude on the residential <br />area; they recognized the risk when they bought residential land; again stated <br />that they will agree to comply with what Planning Commission and Council <br />determine for set backs, but would like the Commission to respond to this <br />request at this time, and advised Mr. Boyer that there was no set completion <br />date as yet, it could be as late as 1996. In response to Mr. Boyer's ques- <br />tions on the traffic counts and how this traffic would effect various <br />intersections in the City, Mr. Sherkow advised that most traffic will come <br />from and return to the east using Brookpark Road to I-480 at Clague Road, <br />and would avoid the more congested Country Club ramp; he explained how they <br />made their projections; and repeated that the Brookpark traffic was greater <br />twelve years ago than it will be after the completion of the Corporate Center