Laserfiche WebLink
PLANNING COMMISSION NOVEMBER 8, 1988 PAGE 6 <br />VII: NEW BUSINESS: <br />Presentation of retail campus signage program by Biskind Development Company. <br />Mr. Thomas suggested, that since there was not a complete membership present, <br />rSr.•. Papandreas, representing Biskind Development Company, just give a brief <br />presentation at this time, but he would like him to elaborate on it at the <br />next meeting. Mr. Papandreas agreed stating that he, too, would like <br />comments from the entire Commission. He explained this signage program was <br />initiated because of complaints about confusing traffice patterns, customers <br />not being able to find Plaza South, and a lack of overall campus identity. <br />Th'is program is designed to get people off the public streets quickly, distri- <br />bute them efficiently, and regulate them clearly. Signage will be consistent <br />in color and style, and will.allow the owners some leverage to deal with some <br />tenants who have signs which they do not believe are in the best interest of <br />the center. He presented a site plan showing the locations of the signage <br />and explained that this program will be implemented with proposed parking lot <br />improvements and landscaping. Three types of signs are proposed: 1) overall <br />retail campus signs defining entries and boundries of the campus; 2) indivi- <br />dual signs identifying various projects and defining the Ring Road; 3) non- <br />illuminsted directional signs located at intersections. He further advised <br />that phase II of the May Company parking lot improvements will be started <br />next spring. There has been some discussion regarding identifying some of <br />their major tenants on the Brookpark Road entrance sign, and hopefully this <br />too would have some leverage to control some of the less desirable signs that <br />are in place now. They are also considering some signage to direct customers <br />out of the shopping center such as "to I-480". Mr. Gorris questioned if they <br />have defined exactly what total sign area would be allocated to each tenant, <br />including those on the outer periphery of the centery which tenant of the <br />shopping center can place signage on the canopy of the mansard, and suggested <br />that the Commission would like to review this criteria in the future. He <br />further suggest.ed, regarding the parking lot improvements, that raised curbs <br />be installed wherever possible since this does maintain a better traffic flow. <br />Mr. Papandreas stated that these are the types of suggestions that they are <br />looking for. Mr. Thomas suggested that when Mr. Papandreas returns he could <br />bring copies of the chart presented this evening, perhaps with some kind of <br />description of the signs if available, as well as some specific problems they <br />now have with tenant signage. <br />VIII. OLD BUSINESS; <br />GTE Mobilnet will be discussed at the next meeting. <br />Traff-Pro Study will be tabled until the next meeting. <br />IX. ADJOURNMENT: <br />B. Gorris moved to excuse the absence of Mr, Betts, Mr. Morgan, and Mr. Bowen, <br />seconded by J. Thomas, and unanimously approved. <br />The meeting was adjourned at 10:30 p.m. <br />J. Thomas, Vice-Chairman B. Oring, Clerk of Commissions