My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03/16/1988 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
1988
>
1988 Architectural Review Board
>
03/16/1988 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:31:16 PM
Creation date
1/29/2019 4:05:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
1988
Board Name
Architectural Review Board
Document Name
Minutes
Date
3/16/1988
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ARCHITECTUR.AL BOARD Ok' REVIEW MARCH 16, 1988 PAGE 2 <br />is not necessary. They will be adding only 250 square foot o.f floor <br />area and 750 square foot of roof area, colors will match the revised <br />color sche7ne which was approved by this Board previously. A small <br />existing pediment will be removed and a new architectural_feature with <br />a sign area will be created further south. Mr. Zergott questioned if <br />they were considering a different material for the mirrors, several of <br />which are still broken. PZr. Carlisle stated that the broken mirrors <br />will be replaced and if the vandalism continues they are considering a <br />reflective lexan as a replacement. Mr. Pattison believes that this <br />treatment would appear to be a different type of building system, since <br />the original architectural features are sq_uares and angles, and this <br />treatment is curved, and is suggesting that they take a look at the <br />design. Mr. Carlisle stated that this treatment is similar to that of <br />the M. C. Sporting Goods area, and is purposely a little different, but <br />they will take another look at it. B. Zergott moved to accept the change <br />as submitted with regard to Mr. Pattison's remarks, seconded by M. Case, <br />and unanimously annroved. <br />Law Director Gareau requested an executive session with the Board at this <br />point. <br />1) Lauren Hill Plaza, 24106 Lorain Road <br />Proposal to construct shopping center. (Variance granted by the Board <br />of Zoning Appeals Januarv 6, 1988), Referred by Planning Commission <br />March 8, 1988. <br />PZr. Seaman, architect, presented matezials for the 50,000 sq_uare foot <br />shopning center: 9 foot cano,ryo uver front side walk will be metal stand- <br />ing seam roof (''Patina Green"by Berridge) ; Piers along canopy will be a <br />center scored block (Custom color 21B by E. P. Henry); sign band will <br />be Drvvit (color No. 55 "VanDyck"); and accent color (H-34 "Deep Red" <br />by Pittsburgh Paints). NIr. Seaman pointed out that site drops down <br />about 9 feet from Lorain Road and only about the top 5 or 6 feet will <br />be visible from the street. The existing trees will be maintained in <br />the rear buffer area and twenty seven 8 to 9 foot Austrian pines will <br />be added?with a 6 foot board on board fence on the southern boarder of <br />the buffer area, fence will be intersnersed with evergreens, or if the <br />Board so desires, .fence could be continuous with the evergreens planted <br />behind it (facing the residential nroperty). Mr. Dillon, an adjacent <br />neighbor, stated the neighbors would prefer the fence to be continuous. <br />Wall mounted light fixtures will be installed on the rear of the building, <br />14 feet above the ground thus spreading the light for apnroximatelv 2$ <br />feet only to the base of the fence.Ground sign will be located 9 feet, <br />6 itiches from the nroperty line and will be under the 40 square foot <br />maximum. Mr. Zergott pointed out that the Erie vibernum nlanted at the <br />base of the sign would grow too liigh and suggested using something lower, <br />possibly taxus everlow, and stated that the other landscaping is more <br />than satisfactorv. In response to Mr. Pattison, Mr. Seaman advised that <br />the final survey is not complete, but they anticinate no more than a <br />2 foot grade separation between their property and the adjacent Ground <br />Round propert_y;'and, in response the the neighbors questions, he further <br />advised that the rear of the building will be masonry block treated with
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.