Laserfiche WebLink
' BOARD OF ZONTNG APPEALS FEBRUARY 3, 1988 PAGE 5 <br />Chairman Remmel advised that cases 9 and 10 would be heard together. <br />9. Scott McKernan, 5354 Devon Dr. <br />Request for variance (1123.12). Request variance to place solid fenee within <br />25 foot side yard set back on corner lot. Please note: side yard set back of <br />house is 17 feet from right-of-way. Violation of Ord. 87-93, Section 1135.06-(a). <br />10. Gary Case, 5351 Hampton Dr. <br />Request for variance (1123.12). Request variance to place solid fence within <br />25 foot side yard set back on co mer lot. (Please note: fence is to be lined <br />up with the fence on property to the rear.) Violation of Ord. 87-93, Section <br />1135.06-(a). <br />Chairman Remmel called all interested parties before the Board. The oath was <br />administered to Mr, and Mrs. Case and Mr. and Mrs. McKernan.- Chairman Remmel <br />stated that the proposed fence will extend from the back of one house to the <br />back of the othex house and will be 17 feet from the right of way. The appli- <br />cants explained that they need the privacy and that they are trying.to prevent <br />any further vandalism. The McKernans wi]:Y be installing a p.obl. They were <br />advised that if tfiey install a pool they wi1T have to enclose it witfi a 6 foot <br />fence. Mr. Bugala believes a privacy screen should be sufficient. B. Grace <br />moved to grant a variance`for both requests to place a 5 foot solid fence within <br />the 25 foot side yard set back on a corner lot at 5354 Devon'and 5351 Hampton <br />Drive, seconded by J. Helon. Roll call,on motion: Grace, Helon, and Remmel, <br />yes. Bugala, no. Motion.passed. Variance granted. <br />11. Tuffy Muffler, 28256 Lorain Road . <br />Reques.t for variance (1123.12). Req.uest 38 square foot variance.for total sign <br />area to change sign ori existing pole.. Violation af Ord. 87-93, Section 1163.06. <br />'Also request variance for 2=.foot 1 inch encroachment into 3 foot set back area <br />(existing.sign encroaches 10 inches into-set back). Violation of Ord. 87-93, <br />Section 1163.06{f)-4. <br />Chairman Remmel called all interested parties before the Board. The oath was <br />adininistered?to Mr, Schnitzler, Wagner Sign Company,-who advised that they are <br />changing.their request.since they will be removing some signs on the wall aiid <br />will not need a variance for the total sign area. The,y will now be replacing <br />the sign on the pole sign to their standard logo sign of 50 square feet;;•since <br />the sigii is'a different'_configuration than the existing sign it will encroach . <br />• further into the set liack. The sign is already built, but he might be able <br />-to put it off center on the pole to reduce the encroachment. It was pointed <br />out..that because of-the shape of the sign, only 6'inches of bottom edge would <br />be encroaching. The Board agreed that because ofthe shape of the sign, it <br />would look better-if it were centered on the pole. R.. Bugala moved to grant <br />the 24 inch encroachment upon the 3 foot set back-for Tuffy Mutfler, seconded <br />by J. Helon, and unanimously ap.proved.. Variance granted. <br />The meeting.was adjourned at 9:40 p.m. <br />C. Remmel. Chairman <br />B. Oring,.Cl-4rk of Commissions