Laserfiche WebLink
PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 28, 1989 PAGE 2 <br />Mr. Ricci, Mr. Olear, Mr. Nicholson, and others from Toys "R" Us presented ? <br />revised plans and introduced Mr. Lepisto, traffic consultant from Traff-Pro. <br />Mr. Nicholson explained that the revised survey has located all the trees <br />on the property, shows all adjacent streets and drives as requested by the <br />Commission, and reflects the recommendations of the Architectural Board <br />of Review regarding the landscaping. He further explained that this plan <br />has 287 parking spaces including fifty six smaller spaces designated for <br />compact cars. Mr. Lepisto gave an overview of the traffic study and <br />presented an accident analysis which had been omitted from the copies <br />presented previously. The survey was taken on Tuesday, March 14th, and <br />he explained that they purposely looked at an off day rather than a more <br />heavily travelled day to determine a minimum use, and used the standards <br />set by the Institute of Transportation Engineers to estimate the number <br />of trips generated by such a facility. He explained that there were 11 <br />basic warrants required by the State of Ohio for the installation of a <br />traffic signal and stated that based on the data collected for the report <br />a traff ic signal was recommended at the Lorain entrance to.the Toys "R" Us <br />store. Since there have been complaints about the Whitethorn and Lorain <br />intersection, that too was studied, and it was concluded that since the <br />. proposed driveway is off set about 50 feet from Whitethorn there could be <br />conflicts with the two drives. He advised that there were three options: <br />the re-alignment of Whitethorn so it would be opposite the Toys "R" Us <br />drive especially since there is a problem with the angle at which Whitethorn <br />comes into Lorain Road; the proposed drive for Toys "R" Us could be re- <br />located so that it is opposite Whitethorn; or, finally, a three phase <br />traffic system which would aceommodate all three streets, but since the ? <br />main concern should be to move traffic on Lorain Road, this would not be <br />the optimal solution. He advised that ther.e had only been one accident <br />at the Whitethron exit in the past two years. The residents who were <br />present advised that there had been another accident in the past few days. <br />Mr. Nicholson stated that they had no objection to installing a traffic <br />light, but that they would prefer .to relocate the Whitethorn Boulevard <br />intersection rather than relocating their proposed driveway. P4r. Ricci <br />explained that relocating their drive would hinder their traffic flow .on <br />the lot (especially for truck traffic) and would make it necessary to <br />remove additional parking spaces.. They also belie.ve that relocating the <br />Whitethorn.intersection would benefit the people using that street, and <br />believes that this could be done within the existing right of way, and <br />without acquiring any additional land. Mr. Lepisto estimated that the <br />road is 24 feet wide and the right of way is probably about 50 feet. He <br />further stated that this would be a traffic activated signal for Toys "R" Us <br />and for Lahitethorn. Mr. Thomas suggested that this issue should be studied <br />further and that more definite plans must be submitted for this relocation. <br />In reference to the parking plan, it was stated at ttfe last meeting that <br />no variances would be needed for the smaller spaces since they are pro- <br />viding more spaces than required and could provide the minimum number of <br />conforming size parking spaces. Building Conmissioner Conway advised that, <br />after some study, it was decided that since the code does define the size <br />of the parking spaces, a variance will be required. Mr. Gorris pointed <br />out that they could easily turn the 56 smaller spaces into 28 conforming <br />spaces and still have more than the required spaces. Building Commissioner <br />Conway verified that they are required to have 252 parking spaces and are <br />providing 287 spaces including the smaller ones. Mr. Ricci stated that <br />the compromise was that if they put in the additional landscape areas to <br />save tr.ees, they could have the smaller spaces. He pointed out that now