Laserfiche WebLink
? <br />-0 <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 9. 1989 PAGE 5 <br />licensed, but unlike the travel agency, rir. Robinson's business was not <br />licensed. Mr'. Robinson advised that he could operate the business out <br />of his apartment if necessary, and that he does not believe that his <br />business is any less secure than Cellular One. Mr. Bowen stated that <br />if he is not promoting his address and just making telephone calls this <br />would be different, but there is still a concern about using a residental <br />apartment building as a business... P1r. Gorris questioned if this business <br />was operated out of Mr. Robinson's residential apartment, would it be <br />before the Commission. Mr. Conway advised that it would unless Mr. <br />Robinson could present further information regarding his licensing, but <br />he does not believe that this business would fall within the Zoning Code <br />definition as a professional person, and therefore he could not operate <br />a business out of his residence, but that decision would be subject to <br />whatever documation he could supply to the Building Department and possibly <br />be subject to review by the Law Department. Mr. Gorris questioned if <br />Mr. Robinson met the criteria of a professional person w4uld he be <br />permitted to operate this in his own apartment. Assistant Law Director <br />Dubelko advised that the key word was dwelling, providing he could meet <br />all the other criteria. J. Thomas moved to approve the use of suite 203 <br />Victoria Plaza, for Robinson's promotions as an amendment to the detailed <br />development plan for the Mixed Use District using one suite of an apart- <br />ment for a business use; seconded by B. Gorris. Roll call on motion: <br />Thomas, Gorris, Betts, Bierman, Bowen, and Traczyk, nb. Mr. Robinson was <br />advised that this would be reviewed by the Building, Zoning, and Develop- <br />ment Committee of Council. <br />IV. NEW DEVELOPMENTS AND SUBDIVISIONS: <br />Chairman Thomas advised that item number 3 would be heard next. <br />3) Oring Estates Subdivision: Preliminary Plan <br />The proposal is to subdivide permanent parcel no. 232-2-2, located on the <br />south side of Oring Road, west of Lansing Drive, into four (4) sublots. <br />Zoning is "B" Residence,-Single and variance will be required. <br />J. Ulisse, architectural representative, and R. Mellino, who holds an <br />option on the property,presented the plat and.explained that there is <br />no access to this property only city right of way, and that the pie shaped <br />lots would require variances at the set back line. City Engineer Cesen <br />clarified that the frontage requirement of 70 feet could not be met at <br />the.50 foot set back line as required, but could be met at a 55 foot set <br />back. Mr. Mellino stated that since the four lots have about.l0 feet• less <br />frontage than required, they could request a variance for the frontage of <br />each lot for approximately 2 feet. Mr. Cesen clarified that the code calls <br />for 70 feet frontage along a curved line, SO feet back from the right of <br />way and that they could request either variance. Mr. Mellino further <br />advised that some of the property backs up to the Westlake line where <br />Stearns Road is proposed, but all the lots are in North Olmsted. Mr. Cesen <br />further advised that a cul-de-sac should have a 60 foot radius, not 40 as <br />shown. Mr. Mellino stated that he had talked with the Fire Chief on this <br />and presented a copy of Ordinance 87-76 which shows the acceptable turn- <br />arounds, it is his contention that this is not a cul-de-sac, it is an <br />acceptable alternative to a 120 foot hammerhead and would be an 80 dia- <br />meter circle turn around. rir. Cesen stated that a hammerhead is a"T"