04/10/1990 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 10, 1990 PAGE 5 buildings. There is an existing sidwalk there now. Since•the buildings are a different brick, they will attempt to find a compatible brick. It was decided this would not have to go the Architectural Board of Review. R. Bierman moved to approve the proposal to construct a link building at St. Richards Catholic Church at 26855 Lorain Road, as submitted, seconded by B. Gorris, and unanimously approved. IV. NEW DEVELOP14ENTS AND SUBDIVISIONS: 1) Developers Diversified, Ltd. and W and Z Properties, Ltd. Assembly and Subdivision Plat. The proposal is to assemble and subdivide permanent parcel nos. 236-10-33, 236-11-8, 236-11-9, 236-11=10, 236-11-11, 236-11-18, and 236-12-10 into two (2) sublots. Location is north of Butternut Ridge Road on the west side of Great Northern Blvd, and is the site of proposed developments by Developers Diversified and Steeple Walk Apartments (approved by Planning Commission December 12, 1989). Zoning is "A" Residence, Single, entirely and both proposed sublots conform to the Zoning Code. Assistant City Engineer McDermott explained that six sublots are being assembled and then subdivided into two lots, one of them (sublot 2) wi11 be for the proposed Steeple Walk Apartments which had been approved pre- viously by Planning Commission and the other (sublot 1) will be Developers Diversified property. Assistant Law,Director Dubelko advised that it " should be s.tated.for the record that this assembly is in no way repre- senting any new type of agreement between the city and the developer as to the use of these parcels or as to the ultimate configuration; that this is just a temporary breakdown of the two large parcels to facilitate the phase one development and it is presumed that parcel 1 will be further - split in the future to accommodate the uses that are under the court order. Mr. Berryhill, representing Developers Diversified, stated that it will take several years for tliem to develop the parcel properly, but they wish to preserve-their right to come back to the Commission later and request proper splits and changes. Mr. Gorris pointed out that the house on the portion of the property that touches Butternut Ridge Road is to be moved since the agreement stated that this lot is to be landscaped. Mr. Berryhill believed that the house might be used as a temporary construction office and/or a marketing office until the proposed clubhouse is constructed at which time the house will be removedo Building Commissioner Conway stated that there is a proposal to relocate. the house to another parcel on Butternut Ridge Road which will be going to the Board of Zoning Appeals and the.Board of Building Code Appeals since the house does. not meet the square footage required. It was clarified that an assembly of two lots will be on the next Planning Commission agenda for the property on which the house is to be moved,and a variance would be required for the frontage y of the lot. Mr. Conway pointed out that a lot that is undersized can be- ,- - built on as long as the side yards,etc. conform to the Zoning Codes. Mre Laisey, owner of the lots, was present and verified that a 15 foot strip and a 60 foot lot will be combined to make a 75 foot wide lot on which to move this house. Mr. Gorris is concerned since an 80 foot width is required and by combining these two lots, another non-conforming, 60 foot vacant lot will remain; and since this is the same ownership, he would like to see tliis.rectified if possible. He also questioned if this house could be used as a sales office for this project: Mr. Berryhill