|
<br />- i
<br />?
<br />
<br />PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY .13, 1990 PAGE 2
<br />IV. NEW DEVELOPMENTS AND SUBDIVISIONS:
<br />1) C. & C. Realty Assembly Plat (Lorain Road) ,
<br />The proposal is to combine permanent parcel nos. 233-8-15, 233-8-16,
<br />and 233-9-1, located on the north side of Lorain Road east of Barton
<br />Road, into one (1) parcel. Zoning of the proposed parcel is split:
<br />Retail Business, General to a distance of approximately 540 feet from
<br />the Lorain Road centerline, and "B"-Residence, Single, on the north
<br />portion. The proposal conforms to the Zoning Code requirements for a
<br />Retail Business, General District. This assembly proposal was initially
<br />heard by Planning Commission on January 23, 1990,
<br />The proposal was withdrawn from the agenda by the developer.
<br />2) Dunlap Assembly Plat.
<br />The plat is an assembly of remnant parcels from the I-480/Stearns Road/
<br />Hastings Drive area (parcel nos. 234-22-14, 234-22-27, 234-22-28,
<br />234-22-29, and 234-22-35), and which the State of Ohio has already sold
<br />at public auction. `Loning is "B" Residence, Single, entirely, and the
<br />assembled parcel does not, nor.did not formerly, conform to the Zoning
<br />Code for required frontage. This item reviewed by Planning Commission
<br />on January 23, 1990, and referred to Board of Zoning Appeals; variance
<br />granted on February 7, 1990.
<br />Chairman Thomas read the request and noted that the variance for frontage
<br />had been granted as recommended by the Planning Commission. Mr. Dunlap
<br />explained that he also received a variance for the front setback to
<br />construct a house. T. Morgan moved that the Dunlap Assembly Plat which
<br />is an.assembly of remnant parcels from the I-480/Stearns Road/Hastings
<br />Drive area (parcels nos. 234-22-14, 234-22-27, 234-22-28, 234-22-29,
<br />and 234-22-35) be approved by the Planning Commission with the variance
<br />granted by the Board of Zoning Appeals, seconded by R. Bierman, and
<br />unanimously approved.
<br />3) Rezoning Request (Gus Georgalis)
<br />The proposal is to rezone permanent parcel no. 232-28-25, located on the
<br />east side of Silverdale Road and presently zoned "B" Residence, Single,
<br />' to retail Business, General, which it abuts.
<br />Mr. Gavin, attorney for Mr. Georgalis, explained that this 47 foot wide,
<br />residentially zoned lot is adjacent to the rear and the south by commer-
<br />cial property, is substandard,.and would never be developed residentially.
<br />The owner of the lot, Mr. Georgalis, would like to use this property for
<br />an additional parking 1ot for his adjacent restaurant. They would leave
<br />a 5 foot green buffer between the park.ing lot and the adjacent house.
<br />In response to Chairman Thomas' questions, Mr. Georgalis advised that
<br />he owned one restaurant, not•. the other adjacent Arby's and Burger King.
<br />Mr. Hoyte, who owns the residence adjacent to the lot, advised that the
<br />6 foot stocka.de fence between the tim properties was his and only goes
<br />to the front of his house. Mr. Thomas pointed out that this business
<br />might not remain as a restaurant, and possibly it could become a bar thus
<br />generating more noise and trash. He does not believe that the 5 foot
<br />buffer is sufficient. Mr. Morgan beleived that the fence should be ex-
<br />tended and bumper stops be installed.. r1r. Betts qtxestioned if there
<br />were any compel.ling reasons to rezone this- property. Mr. Gavin reiterated.
|