Laserfiche WebLink
, PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 13, 1990 PAGE 3 <br />restrictive Mixed Use classification is in place. Mr. Dubelko clarified <br />that the case that Mr. Gorris mentioned was not tried in the court, it <br />was an agreement between the city and the developer and the uses decided <br />upon were Mixed Use: offices, hotels, and multi-family, the same uses <br />that the Planning Commission has considered upon for the more restrictive <br />Mixed Use classification. T. Morgan moved to approve the rezoning request <br />of Great Northern properties to rezone permanent parcels number 236-18-7, <br />236-18-8, 236-18-11, and 236-18-15 located on the west side of Columbia <br />Road between Country Club Boulevard and I-480 for a distance of approxi- <br />mately275 feet west from the center line of Columbia Road, from the existing <br />zone of "A" Residence, Single to a zoning of Mixed Use which abuts on the <br />west, seconded by B. Gorris. Roll call on motion: Morgan, Gorris, Betts, <br />Bierman, Bowen, and Thomas, no. Motion failed to pass. Mr. Morgan clari- <br />fied that his reason for disapproving this was that the present Mixed Use <br />code is not restrictive enough re-lative to retail use. The Commission <br />will attempt to get a more restricted Mixed Use code written and enacted <br />at which time they will look at this property again. In reference to that, <br />J. Thomas moved to send for review to the Planning Review Committee that <br />Mr. Gorris chairs, the current Mixed Use zoning classification and to ask <br />Mr. Gorris's committee to come up with a new definition of Mixed Use, a <br />new classification, that is more restrictive of retail, and will act as <br />more of a buffering type of transition to areas such as residential and <br />recreational that might be affected adversly; and also to request that <br />the Law Department research the question that was brought up in the <br />committee meeting relative as to whether if multi-family is put in T4ixed- <br />._ Use it is in violation of the charter, seconded by R. Bowen, and unani- <br />mously approved. <br />2) Roger Barb is Subdivision - <br />The proposal is to subdivide permanent parcel no. 235-6-29, located at the <br />northeast corner of the Kennedy Ridge Road and `Jictoria Lane intErsectiori, <br />into three (3) sublots. Zoning is "B" Residence, Single, and all proposed <br />sublots conform to the Zoning Code requirements for frontage and area. <br />Note: This subdivision was previously reviewed and approved by Planning <br />Commission (July 26, 1988) but a plat was not submitted for recording. <br />City Engineer McDermott explained that the developer had not submitted the <br />plat for recording within the 30 day period as stipulated by the ordinance. <br />There have been no: changes from the original proposal other than the <br />addition of an easement at the rear of the property which had been requested <br />by the city. B. Gorris moved to approve the Roger Barbis Subdivision to <br />subdivide permanent parcel no. 235-6-29 into 3 sublots as previously ap- <br />proved, seconded by T. Morgan, and unanimously approved. <br />3) J.P.N. Inc. Subdivision and Assembly Plat <br />The proposal is to subdivide permanent parcel no. 237-19-20, located on the <br />north side,of Mastick Road, east of Columbia Road, into four (4) sublots. <br />Included in this proposal are permanent parcel numbers 237-19-2, 237-19-22, <br />and 237-19-26. Zoning is "A" Residence, Single; proposed sublot nos. 1 and <br />3 do not, nor did not formerly, conform to the Zoning Code frontage <br />requirement. <br />City Engineer McDermott explained that 80'foot frontage would be required <br />and sublot 1 is slightly less than that when measured at right angles as