12/05/1990 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

A CITY OF NORTH OLMSTED BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS MINUTES - DECENIBER 5, 1990 Chairman Bugala called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. Present: R. Gomersall, J. Helon, T. Restifo, and R. Bugala. Mr. Grace arrived at 7:45 p.m. Also Present: Building Commissioner Conway, Law Director M. Gareau, and Clerk of Comnissions B. Oring. T. Restifo moved to approve the minutes of the November 12, 1990 meeting as prepared, seconded by R. Gomersall, and unanimousl.y approved. Election of Officers: Chairman Bugala announced that election of officers would be held at this time: T. Restifo moved to nominate Mr. Robert Gomersall for chairman for the year beginning Janua.ry 1991, seconded by R. Bugala. No other nominations were made and nominations were closed. Mr. Gomersall was elected chairman tmanimously. J. Helon moved to nominate Mr. Thomas Restifo for vice chairman from January 1991 to December 1992, seconded by R. Gomersall. No other nominations were made and nominations were closed. Mr: Restifo was elected vice chairman unanimously. Marathon Petroleum Com an 27645 Lorain Road. Request for variance (1123.12). Request 37.67 square foot variance for one side of pole sign: request 3 foot setback variance for location of pole sign; request variance to have 2 pole signs on property; and request 191.3 square foot variance for total sign area. Violations of Ord. 87-93, Sections 1163.06(f)4; and 1163.06(d). Request.continued fron meeting of October 3, 1990. Chairman Bugala called all interested parties before the Board. The oath Naas administered to Mr. Harma, engineer from Marathon, who explained that they are proposing to remove 185 square feet of existing signage in an attempt to get the 37.67 square foot variance for the second pole sign which will have a reader sign to replace an existing pole sign. Building Commissioner Coniaay clarified that one of the pole signs on the property was.a sign attached to a light pole and it was to be removed. So there Noould be one pole sign and one ground sign plus the building sign. Several of the smaller signs would be removed and the price signs would be tmder the 4 square feet. R. Bugala moved to accept the variance for a 37.67 square foot variance for one side of a pole sign and a 3 foot set back variance for the location of the pole sign, and the request for the variance for two pole signs is negated on the basis that all of the sigaage will be taken off the remaining pole sign, and will grant whatever total square foot variance is necessary as designated by the Building Commissioner, seconded by J. Helon. Roll call: Bugala, Helon, Gomersall, and Restifo, yes. Mr. Grace abstained. Variances granted. 1