01/08/1991 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. . -, - v drive) which fronts on Coltunbia Road. Mr. Ziegman explained the proposal to Mr. Wilms and another neighbor. They had no objection to the request. R. Bowen moved to approve the proposal to subdivide the lot of Sunset Memorial Park lmown as parcel number 236-24-16, located on the east side of the original Columbia Road north of Sunset Memorial Cemetery, into two (2) parcels. Zoning is "A" Residence, single for both, entirely, seconded by M. Betts, and tmanimously approved. 2) Great Northern Shopping Center, Plaza North and Plaza South Lot Adjustment. The proposal is to re-align the existing property line between permanent parcel numbers 235-27-1 and 235-27-10 (Great Northern Shopping Center, Plaza North and South) to remove an existing building encroachment. Location is the northeast area of the Victoria Lane/Country Club Blvd. Intersection. Zoning is retail business, general, entirely, and the proposal conforms the Zoning Code. Mr. Papandreas, representing Great Northern, explained that this was merely a lot adjustment between two adjoining landowners since one building of Plaza South is encroaching on Plaza North's property. This realignment will rectify the situation. City Engineer Deichmann stated,_ that there were no code violations and the Engineering Department had no problem with this. Mr. Papandres presented a site plan indicating exactly where the encroachment is. L. Orlowski moved to approve the proposal to realign the existing property line between permanent parcel number 235-27-1 and 235-27-10 of the Great Northern Shopping Center Plaza North and South, seconded by J. Thomas, and unanimously approved. It was clarified that there was an incorrect permanent parcel on the linen which will have to be changed (the parcel numbers in the motion are correct). Mr. Thomas reminded Mr. Papandreas that the signage advising "Entering traffic does not stop" has not yet been installed at the Brookpark Entrance of Great Northern. Mr. Papandreas stated that he was aware that this has not yet been installed and is trying to get it completed. V. COMM[JNICATIONS : A letter from Mayor Boyle advising that since Mr. Bierman has not been re- appointed to the Commission, another representative to the Landmarks Commission must be appointed. It was decided to defer this appointment imtil the next meeting. VI. COMNIITTEE REPORTS: The members will be meeting with the Mayor and the members of the Board of Zoning appeals at 6:30 p.m. on February 12, 1991 to discu.ss the ma,ster plan which the Planning Commission is now reqtiired by charter to submit every 4 years. VII. OLD BUSINESS: The new Zoning Codes along with the proposed revisions have been submitted to the BZD Committee of Council, but no action has been taken as yet. VIII. NEW BUSINESS: 5 ` ?