Laserfiche WebLink
_ ...; <br />the traffic pa.ttern could be improved since he is still concerned about a fcur ? e <br />lane road dead ending into a parking lot. In reference to tabling thet <br />proposal, Assistant Law Director Dubelko stated that since the Commission just'. : <br />found out that the property had to be split, it would not be unreasonable to <br />ask the developer to table this again. Mr. Acciarri agreed to-table the <br />building plans, but reminded the Comnission that he had been before them for <br />months. A representative from Lakewood Federal Savings and Loan spoke from <br />the audience stating that they are concerned that this proposal would exit <br />across their property and would create a bottle neck in the area. He was <br />advised that the drives would not be across his property, and that the <br />developer had worked with the city to get the best traffic pattern possible. <br />T. Morgan moved to table the Carter Plaza West proposal to construct a retail <br />building tmtil the next Planning Commission meeting, seconded by J. Thomas, <br />and unanimously approved. <br />N. NEW DEVEL,OPMQVTS AND SUBDIVISIONS: (Heard at this point). <br />1) Carter Plaza West/Best Property Lot Splito <br />The proposal is to subdivide Permanent Parcel No. 232-26-15 (Best Products) <br />into (2) lots, one of which is the site of the proposed Carter Plaza West <br />currently being reviewed by Planning Commission. Location is the north side <br />of Lorain Road between First Federal Savings & Loan and Gastown. Zoning is <br />Retail Business, General, entirely, and the proposal does not conform to the <br />Zoning Cocie Requirement for frontage for either sublot. <br />(Please Note: Variance re uest will be heard b the Board of Zonin A eaTs <br />on Februarv 13. 1991. <br />It was again stated tha* neither lot would have sufficient frontage after the <br />lot split. Assistant Law Director Dubelko advised that under the code • <br />Planning Commission must review subdivisions and forward on to the Board of <br />Zoning Appeals. Mr. Acciarri agreed that the lot had insufficient frontage on <br />Lorain Road, but pointed out that the store fronts will face the Best drive <br />and there is more than 150 feet of frontage along that drive. Building <br />Commissioner Conway advised that the code requires 150 feet of frontage along <br />Lorain Road. J. Thomas moved to forward the Carter Plaza West/Best Products <br />Lot Split with the recommendation that the variance as described in the Agenda <br />not be granted since it is the position of the Commission that this will be <br />creating 2 non-conforming lots and setting a precedent for other developments <br />along Lorain Road since there are many parcels with limited frontage. <br />According to the developer there is an opportunity for leasing this property, <br />but it is not up to the Planning Commission or the Board of Zoning Appeals to <br />decide which is economically beneficial to the developer, seconded by T. <br />Morgan, and unanimously approved. . <br />III. BUILDING DEPARTMIIVT REQUESTS: (Continued) <br />2) Shell Oil Company, 23385 Lorain Road. ? <br />Proposal to construct food mart and new canopy on existing gas station site. <br />Heard by Architectural Board of Review January 16, 1991. <br />(Tabled from meeting of January 22, 1991). <br />(Please Note: Variance re uest will be heard b the Board of Zonin A eals <br />on February 13, 1991). <br />Mr. Coburn, representing Shell Oil presented a copy of a letter that they had ? <br />sent to the owner of the adjacent property who advised them that the Kroger <br />Company held a lease that would prohibit them from selling additional <br />2