Laserfiche WebLink
? <br />for the Army Corpo of Engineers who had previously declined jurisdiction; <br />Police Department had no objection but suggested that timing of the traffic <br />signal would ha.ve to be studied and Fire Department advised that water supply <br />fire protection and access for fire apparatus must be supplied. In reference <br />to the traffic studies presented previously, N1r. Orlowski suggested that <br />because the studies started at 7:00 a.m. and many.drivers might leave earlier, <br />that there could be some inaccuracies. Mr. Gorris pointed out that there were <br />two studies done, one by the city and one by the developer, and both seemed to <br />agreee Mr. Deichmann advised that a 12 hour count was usually adjusted to <br />include the 24 hour count, but there could be a minor discrepancy. Regarding <br />the dumpster at the north end of building "C", Mra Skoulis had requested that <br />it be relocated since it appeared to be in front of one of the units. After <br />some discussion it was decided that it could be located next to the garage at <br />the end of building "B". It was clarified that the Architectural Review Board <br />did not intend that the board on board fence be extended along Brookpark Road <br />right-of-way. (fence line was marked on plans approved by the Board). Mr. <br />Bollinger clarified that their internal road would not be dedicated, that they <br />would maintain it and that the equipment would probably not be stored on the <br />site. The members agreed that the location of the club house would not have to <br />be changed since the fence is to be installed. The audience was invited to <br />comment. Mra Bohlmann, Service Director, urged that the Commission recommend <br />in its approval that a drainage culvert pipe and appropriate inlets be <br />installed for drainage and that all plans must be approved by the City <br />Engineer since open ditches have been a problem. Mr. Gorris clarified that the <br />developer had requested that the ditch be left open for no longer than 5 <br />years, until either the new exit ramp is built or until phase 2 is built, but <br />pointed out that the Planning Commission's initial motion had required that <br />the ditch be covered. Mr. Skoulis questioned the fact that it had been stated <br />previously that a 48 inch pipe ran into a 36 inch pipe and ca.used problems. <br />Mr. Deichmarm stated that this would be reviewed with the drai.nage plans, but <br />does not see this as a problem since there is to be retention on the site. <br />Mr. Bollinger explained that their contract had stipulated that they would <br />ma.i.ntain the ditch at no cost to the city for five years tmtil either the exit <br />ramp or Phase two was constructed because in either event the culvert would <br />have to be rebuilt. If at the end of the five years neither of these are built <br />they agreed to install the culvert. Mr. Bohlmarnz stated that he would advise <br />Council that the administration is not in favor of this agreement. Mr. <br />Deichmarm advised that the Engineering Department would not approve an open <br />ditch. Councilman McKay pointed out that there was also a mosquito problem <br />with open ditches. He also wanted a fence adjacent to all residential <br />properties, and was shown the plan on which the Architectural Board stipulated <br />exactly where the fence was to be located. He requested that a time limit be <br />set for the completion of the fence. Mr. Bollinger advised that the first <br />building should be completed by Thanksgiving and one building would be <br />completed within each 30 to 45 day period after that. They would prefer to <br />install the fence all at one time since it could not be i.nstalled until all <br />grading was completed. The first building constructed would be Building "G". <br />After some discussion, it was decided that the fence must be installed prior <br />to the occupancy permit being issued for the last building or by August of <br />1992, whichever occurs first, and it was pointed out that if there were any <br />delays, the Commission could grant an extension. Mr. Nicola, an adjacent <br />resident on Clague Road, reminded the Comnission on February 26th they gave <br />him permission to get a second wetlands study and Mr. Bollinger agreed. He <br />has talked with Mr. Licvar, a biologist with the Army. of Engineers, several <br />2