My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07/09/1991 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
1991
>
1991 Planning Commission
>
07/09/1991 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:31:53 PM
Creation date
1/29/2019 5:40:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
1991
Board Name
Planning Commission
Document Name
Minutes
Date
7/9/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />believed that spaces are needed for a truck turn around. Mr. Conway clarified <br />that they need a 12 by 25 foot space for loading and one parking space could be <br />enlarged. Mr. Thomas stated that since the back of the building was identical <br />to the front it would indicate that at some time they might want access onto <br />Brookpark Road. If there is ever a shared access or ring road at that point <br />there should be an area that is not used for parking. Mr. Shartman will revise <br />these plans and it was explained that the Commission is permitted to landbank <br />some of the required parking, as long as there is room to install it later if <br />it is needed. T. Morgan moved to refer the Great Northern Dodge proposal to <br />construct a new building to be leased to Boaters' World to the Architectural <br />Review Board, to the Safety Department and the Engineering Department, and with <br />the idea that the developer present to the A.R.B. more detailed landscaped <br />plans and look seriously into eliminating some of the shown parki.ng spaces with <br />the idea of landbanking them and including them in some sort of combined <br />landscaped plan, seconded by J. Thomas, and unanimously approved. <br />IVo NEW DEVELOPMIIVTS AND SUBDIVISIONS: <br />1) Christ the King Property Rezoning Proposal. <br />The proposal is to rezone property owned by Christ the King CoirIInunity, Inc. <br />(permanent parcel nos. 234-8-2,6,8,and 234-13-27 28), located west off Barton <br />Road and abutting the North Olmsted south corporation line, from an existing <br />zone district of Mixed Use "B" to zone district of Multiple Residence, <br />Single-Family Cluster, and Single Family. <br />Mr. Grindell, attorney, representing Christ The King, introduced the Reverend <br />Kuhn, and Mr. Isgar from the church. He explained that this is a 57 acre parcel <br />off Barton Road in North Olmsted with some additional adjacent property in <br />Olmsted Township. This property is bounded by Olmsted Township and Lorain <br />County and partially abuts I-480. They are requesting that a 20 acre segment <br />urnnediately adjacent to I-480 be rezoned to Multiple Residence, a small portion <br />fronting on Barton Road be rezoned to Single Family, and the balance be rezoned <br />to Single Family Cluster. They originally planned an institutional conumun-ity <br />which would ha.ve included duplex homes. The City had approved the first phase <br />of this development and the first duplex has been built. It is no longer <br />feasible to continue with these plans, and they are attempting to rezone the <br />parcel in order to re-sell it. He advised that they have just found out that <br />they will need a referendtun to rezone to multi-family, previously they had been <br />told that the rnunber of multi=family units were under the threshold required so <br />that 240 tmits could have been built without a vote. Because of the location of <br />this parcel they believe that this proposed zonlnro would be the most desirable. <br />It was clarified that the Mixed Use "B" zoning was specifically written for <br />this parcel. Mr. Thomas would like to lmow how this parcel was zoned <br />originally. He questioned if there were specific developers interested in the <br />property. Mr. Grindell stated that two developers were interested, but they do <br />have concerns because of the proximity of the freeway and the configuration of <br />the southwestern segment. No developer has been interested in in constructing <br />single family homes because of the traffic noise from the freeway. The single <br />family cluster zonin,g would accommodate duplex units without a referendtun <br />according to Law Director Gareau, but there would be a possibility of a <br />referendun if triplex units were constructed. Mr. Thomas questioned if either <br />of the developers were interested in senior housing and explained the Mixed Use <br />"D" zoning which could accommodate retirement housing. Mr. Grindell is <br />concerned that this location would not be close enough to services for <br />2
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.