Laserfiche WebLink
retirement living, and it was explained that this zoning would allow some local <br />retail. He advised that the zoning lines shown were drawn according to the <br />proximity of the interstate and the amount of multifamily units that they <br />previously thought could have been built without a vote. They will take the <br />Mixed Use "D" possibility back to the developers, explaining the the lender had <br />previously been charitable, but that was changing so the church must sell. <br />However, they do want to work with the City to find the best possible use. <br />It was clarified that the whole middle section of the property on either side <br />of the existing road was Single Family, Cluster, that note of the property was <br />zoned Single Family. Assistant La,w Director Dubelko clarified that the present <br />zoning, Mixed Use "B", permits Single Family, the old cluster type housing, but <br />does not provide for multiple dwelling, high rise residential or business. Mr. <br />Gorris explained to the new members that original proposal included an <br />educational campus, skilled care facility, and retirement homes. Residents were <br />asked to make their coirnnentse Mrs. Skettle, a resident of Barton Road, <br />questioned if the one existing road was the only access, pointing out that <br />there are problems with speeding on Barton Road which is heavily travelled. She <br />does not believe that North Olmsted needs any more multifamily which would add <br />even more Lrassic ana sLaLea znaL lz r,ney ria.a LO uulJ-u, _L1 <br />fami_ly. She believed that the wild life should be kept i <br />Grindell advised that they have retained a consultant tc <br />delineation, and as far as they lmow now there is less <br />wetlands. In response to Mr. Skoulis questions, it was <br />referendun was required only to rezone property to Multifamil <br />previously zoned Multifamily land. Mr. Conway believed that r <br />Single Family Cluster zoning would also require a refere: <br />zoning allows 3 family units. Mr. Grindell stated that <br />advised that if duplexes were built on property zoned for ? <br />referendum would be needed. Under those circimistances, Mr. <br />some restriction would have to be placed on the land. It was <br />Skoulis that approval would be required from the Commission <br />to submitting the rezoning ordinance to the electorate. Mr. <br />that this is anopportunity for the Commission to work wi <br />conjunction with the proposed master plan. Mr. Skoulisis <br />rezoning this to Multifa.mily, a precedent would be set for <br />Mr. Morgan stated that the Cotruni.ssion must consider each pr <br />and pointed aut that land awners do have some rights. Mr. Gr <br />they intend to work wi:th the City but they could not wait fo <br />master plan is completed since the bank is pressuring <br />suggested that the proposal be tabled until the Commission co <br />of a planner as to an appropriate use for this parcel. Mr. G <br />about askung the City to pay for a study for private propert <br />stated tha,t they would be willing to work with the City oi <br />study. Mr. Wilkens, a resident of Barton, believed that the : <br />I-480 could be solved by constructing a row of office buildin <br />freeway and with si.ngle family homes on the balance of the <br />clarified for him that Mixed Use "D" did not indicate an <br />housing, it was merely a designation of a specific type of M <br />that _the quality of housing was up to the developer, and <br />quality building had to be constructed in order to receive a <br />cost of the property. There are minimtun square footage rec <br />size of both the lots and the homes, but this cannot be c <br />specific zoning is established. The Reverend Kuhn reiteratE <br />must sell, but would like something developed that would b <br />City. Mr. 5koulis is concerned that they cannot control what <br />biiuuiu UC .7111g1C <br />n this area. Mr. <br />do the wetlands <br />than an acre of <br />explained that a <br />T, not to develop <br />?zoning to the new <br />idun because this <br />the Law Director <br />:luster homes, no <br />Conway believes, <br />clarified for Mr. <br />and Council prior <br />'homas pointed out <br />:h a developer in <br />concerned that by <br />other developers. <br />?posal separately, <br />ndell stated that <br />- a year until the <br />hem. Mr. Thomas <br />Lld ask the advice <br />>rris is concerned <br />T. Mro Grindell <br />i the cost of the <br />ioise problem from <br />;s adjacent to the <br />property. It was <br />inferior type of <br />xed Use District, <br />usually a better <br />'air return on the <br />sirements for the <br />=termined until a <br />3 that the church <br />a an asset to the <br />i developer <br />3